Page 5 of 17 FirstFirst ... 3456715 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 165

Thread: Catalyst 9.2 Released, Still Fails To Deliver XvBA

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    57

    Default

    I went back to 9.1 because of my issue with xinerama. I can't work with a big desktop where maximized window takes both of my screens.
    I'm very sad about this, because xv got better with 9.2, but now i can't use it.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    314

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Boerkel View Post
    I went back to 9.1 because of my issue with xinerama. I can't work with a big desktop where maximized window takes both of my screens.
    I'm very sad about this, because xv got better with 9.2, but now i can't use it.
    Did you do an "aticonfig --initial" after installing 9.2?

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2

    Default

    Dont know if this is the right place to post, but doing so in all ignorance.

    I installed the new driver hoping it would have support for geometry shaders. but glxinfo still does not show the presence of the GL_EXT_geometry_shader4 extension. When I tried a simple application with geometry shaders, the glProgramParameteriEXT() method is seg faulting.

    Anyone knows if there is a way to get geometry shaders to work? any help is appreciated

    (btw i have a HD4850 card)

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by grantek View Post
    Did you do an "aticonfig --initial" after installing 9.2?
    No and yes. I didn't, but i tried now and it doesn't help.

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    365

    Default

    Okay, first impressions:
    1. Well... I got used to the fact, that the driver is always increasing, so now wonder it's 80 MB now
    2. Compiz "blur windows" effect still doesn't work
    3. amdcccle starts fine and fast for me
    4. Warcraft 3 runs just as slow (maybe 5 fps faster) as (than) with 9.1 after it decreased by 50% in January
    5. Uhm... my xorg.log says the module was build on 4th February... Why has the driver been released that late then?
    6. Just checking wether starting a second X server works now... At least it's listed in the known issues now! EDIT: okay, hardlock
    7. Testing S2RAM with Compiz, too, now... That one has been in the known issues for quite some time now, though. EDIT: okay, corrupted+lookup (though I could still move my mouse)

    By the way, for everyone who complains about no changes: This release has fixed that many bugs and added many other bugs I was confronted with to the known issues list, and I like that MUCH more than support for crossfire which breaks everything else.
    Last edited by NeoBrain; 02-21-2009 at 08:23 AM.

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    573

    Default

    Someone kill fglrx driver, please. He'll do a favour to humanity.

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    209

    Default

    My initial post was positive, unfortunately things have changed.

    The FPS increase is unreliable, at times it will drop from 80 to 15 for no obvious reason.
    mythfrontend only worked the once with opengl. From subsequent starts, it exhibits the same old bug of not displaying the menu change.

    Have experienced hardlocks when changing to a VT sometimes. My smooth sailing is over it seems..

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    58

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by grantek View Post
    Did you do an "aticonfig --initial" after installing 9.2?
    No... were there radical enough changes between 9.1 and 9.2 to warrant this?

    To be honest, I had seen the "X crash on startup" problem with 9.1, but it was a very random thing. With 9.2 it was more often that X crashed than it started up properly.

    9.2 is basically unusuable for me at this point.

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by storma View Post
    I've seen an increase in FPS while playing savage 2. This is good.
    I haven't measured the result but I think I got an increase too.

    Card: 4850/512MB

    Quote Originally Posted by grantek View Post
    Did you do an "aticonfig --initial" after installing 9.2?
    If he had previously installed 9.1 (or even an older one), this step is not necessary....AFAIK, please correct me if i'm wrong. ^^

  10. #50
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Merida
    Posts
    1,099

    Default

    You perform --initial to load the module in xorg.conf (if it's already there it won't do anything). I don't know how you guys install the drivers, but when I do it I first completely uninstall the older ones (run the uninstall script and remove /etc/ati), rebuild and restart X, install the new drivers, and finally reboot. This I found to be the best way to go about installation.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •