Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 57

Thread: AMD's Legacy Driver Will Not Support X Server 1.6

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Under the bridge
    Posts
    2,146

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by grigi View Post
    In order of importance:
    1. Power management
    2. Redirected direct rendering (DRI2 & GEM/TTM)


    Shaders (OpenGL2 / GLSL) would be nice too
    ++

    Redirected direct rendering indirection is on track (hey, why don't you make the acronym bigger, it's amusing!) OpenGL 3.0 support would be awesome, but I don't think it's gonna happen this year. GLSL at least, pretty please?
    Last edited by BlackStar; 03-06-2009 at 08:46 AM. Reason: sp

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    270

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stormking View Post
    You seem to live in a parallel universe. In my world, people just want a working driver and don't really care if it's open source or not.
    Why don't u use Windows/Mac then. Or maybe better, why on earth are u using Linux then?

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    82

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phoronix View Post
    Phoronix: AMD's Legacy Driver Will Not Support X Server 1.6

    Early this morning we shared that AMD is dropping R300 through R500 support in the Catalyst driver. Beginning with the Catalyst 9.4 release, the Windows and Linux drivers will only support the R600 and R700 series (and eventually, R800) of ATI Radeon graphics processors...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=NzExOQ

    It's an inevitable move with a proprietary solution... However it comes a bit too soon IMHO, because the free alternative has still a long way to go before it reaches a complete expected feature set (with stability and performance).

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    912

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stormking View Post
    Well, right now it doesn't work at all. Before that, OpenGL didn't work with WINE. And before that, there was no support for Compositing or AIXGL. And before that, it crashed on a regular basis. And before that, XVideo-on-TV-Out was broken for 18 months. Not to mention that the *whole time*, logging out or trying to switch to the console froze the whole system.
    Are you saying that you have currently have no opengl in wine, no compositing, no aiglx, regular crashes, and no tv-out? Last I checked, AMD had addressed all these issues, so what exactly is the problem? "Doesn't work at all" isn't very descriptive you see - you have no x output at all, or what?

    You seem to live in a parallel universe. In my world, people just want a working driver and don't really care if it's open source or not.
    Yes. I live in a parallel universe. It's called "reality".


    So I have to be thankful that after not being able to deliver a working driver for about five years, ATI now finally decided to do the absolute minimum to help the OSS comunity to write their own driver?
    AMD/ATI's drivers have dramatically improved in the past two years, since they properly started to support linux for the consumer. And their "minimum" help was more than OSS community was asking for.

    Next time when you buy a brand new car and something is broken, try to imagine the manufacturer promises you to fix it "next month". Five years later - your car still doesn't work - they give you some papers and tell you to fix it yourself.
    This analogy is so full of holes that not even a disused space station such as B5 could be used to plug them.

    I get that you want to rant on and vent some frustration. Fair enough. But it's time for reasonable discussion now.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    112

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MaestroMaus View Post
    Why don't u use Windows/Mac then. Or maybe better, why on earth are u using Linux then?
    Are you serious? In your mind the only reason to use Linux is because it's free?

    Quote Originally Posted by mirv View Post
    Are you saying that you have currently have no opengl in wine, no compositing, no aiglx, regular crashes, and no tv-out? Last I checked, AMD had addressed all these issues, so what exactly is the problem? "Doesn't work at all" isn't very descriptive you see - you have no x output at all, or what?
    First, there were minor quirks like the freezing issue (no, it never got fixed for me). Then, suddenly, the video overlay did not work on tv-out, anymore. This was left unfixed for 18 months. In the meantime, "Textured Video" was introduced, what helped a little bit but was far from stable. Then, suddenly, it got disabled on the second head.

    Both got fixed, eventually, so that after 20 months I had XV on TV-Out, again. Did I mention that ATI teached me patience?

    Soon after that the driver became more and more unstable. Than the new codebase was introduced and was supposed to bring Compositing and AIXGL. Of course, it didn't work at first. But I was still patient.

    Than, support for XServer 1.5 was introduced, so that I could finally upgrade my distribution. But instead of this, fglrx stopped to work, completely. It still doesn't.

    Quote Originally Posted by mirv View Post
    Yes. I live in a parallel universe. It's called "reality".
    So in your so-called "reality", there are only mainstream Windows users and hardcore Open Source Evangelists? Nothing in between? Seems to me like a very limited "reality".

    Quote Originally Posted by mirv View Post
    AMD/ATI's drivers have dramatically improved in the past two years,
    Not for me. Instead, it got worse. Whenever something was fixed, another, even bigger problem appeared.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    25

    Default

    OK, that's not a good choice by AMD. Supporting recent Xserver is not a huge work (as a driver can still usually use API's from previous versions, maybe with minor tweaks), and sometimes it's just recompiling.

    If Ubuntu R300-R500 geeks start spamming ATI support forums and channels, they will start thinking about releasing an update for the 1.6. Although Canonical is maybe crazy enough to downgrade to 1.5 just because of binary blob compatibility (if they weren't pushed by Fedora to go more with the bleeding edge stuff).

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    270

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stormking View Post
    Are you serious? In your mind the only reason to use Linux is because it's free?
    Dodging the question by asking one yourself won't help. It still isn't polite either.

    Since you seem to mix up open source software with free, I'll explain why I think it is important to have access tot the source code of programs:
    1. It allows for debates and different views on how something should be programmed best. Professionals from all over the world and from different company's can look at the code, and debate about what's the best thing to do. I know it has a flip side, but I'll consider that necessary evil.
    2. It allows professionals to check whether is has security errors, which is very important in a world where virtually everything is connected by computers.
    3. It doesn't make you dependant. Open source software doesn't limit you to specific file types or programs that other Operating Systems can not have. This makes it possible to switch any time you like.

    Oh and one other thing, Open source software isn't free (it is, if you choose to be irresponsible). OSS will only get moving when governments/company's/users keep/start contributing to it in any fashion; whether it is by hacking themselves, or by donating money (I donate money to the Gnome Foundation if you wish to know).

    Can you answer my question now, please?

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    69

    Default

    I'm a bit pissed. Not because AMD are dropping support for the old chipsets, I know what it's like maintaining legacy codebases and I think it's a good idea.

    What I'm pissed about is that if they just recompiled the driver for X server 1.6 the people that want to use Catalyst 9.3 could have done so for the next 6 months at least, until the next X server upgrade hits the major distros. But now they won't even be able to use it with Ubuntu 9.04.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    575

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bridgman View Post
    I seem to remember you asking, on this very site, for someone to kill the fglrx driver as a favour to humanity

    Other than 3D support (which a bunch of devs are working on now) where do you see the open source driver being deficient ?
    I may be wrong but I think remembering I suggested to kill the driver and make the people working on it move to the open source development work.

    Anyways I'll bounce the question back to you:

    If I have an ATI 9600XT card, how exactly will it work? Is everything complete (excluding 3d)? Is 2d accelleration really done? Xv? etc etc etc .

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,514

    Default

    AFAIK everything except 3D is already working at least as well as fglrx. EXA, XAA and Xv are all supported, including both textured video and overlay.

    Overlay is tear-free, not sure if textured video is tear-free today (might just be 5xx and up).

    Video is flicker-free with compiz but the usual tearing issues apply (since with a compositor you want the compositor to sync to vblank, not the Xv driver, and that is still iffy with Compiz).

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •