Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 65

Thread: Unreleased ATI Catalyst Driver Appears In Ubuntu

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    521

    Default

    So since the driver for X Server 1.6 is the future Catalyst 9.4, it pretty much confirms that Catalyst 9.3 will not support X Server 1.6, making it instantly useless for all upcoming distros?

    I think AMD should AT LEAST provide X Server 1.6 support for 9.3...

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    30

    Default

    Interesting performance results on jaunty now:

    UT2004: from 60 to about 75 fps.
    glxgears: from 10k to 1k fps.
    ...I guess, the first is an improvement in the driver code; the second a better power management? The only thing, I still miss is the hardware sensor information in the control panel, as the Windows version has

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,577

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ernstp View Post
    Everyone has access to it of cource! You should thank Ubuntu for getting out so everyone can use it!
    https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/...00.orig.tar.gz
    Looks like yet another fglrx installer ripped apart by helpful Ubuntu developers.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,116

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phoronix
    This X Server 1.6 supportive driver is not compatible with R300-500 graphics processors, since that support has been dropped beginning with Catalyst 9.3.
    This sounds like Catalyst 9.3 wouldn't support R3xx-R5xx, which it does in reality.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    69

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hubick View Post
    I hate these back room deals where some people get access to working code and others don't. Crap like this reminds me of the reasons I switched to Linux and Free Software in the first place. On behalf of all non-Ubuntu users, ATI can take their closed binary drivers and shove it :P
    On behalf of all Ubuntu users, I don't like this either.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Albuquerque NM USA
    Posts
    347

    Default

    I'm a Ubuntu user and I don't have a problem with it.

    This version of FGLRX is still the same old proprietary code it has always been, all Bryce did was put a wrapper (open) around it.

    Why shouldn't AMD give a beta version of their as of yet unreleased development driver to the largest and most popular desktop Linux for testing with their as of yet unreleased development next version? Is not the additional testing and exposure a good thing?

    To me...this is progress!.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    DG, IL, USA
    Posts
    195

    Default

    Why stop with Ubuntu..why shouldn't Fedora Suse Mandriva have the opportunity to test the driver swith their pre-releases ?

    Mandriva 2009.1 is already at Rc1 and is due out next month.
    Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety,deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
    Ben Franklin 1755

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,386

    Default

    As far as I know all those distros have access to pre-release drivers already through the beta program.

    None of those distros *ship* binary drivers though, do they ? I think that's the essential difference here.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Arctic circle, Finland
    Posts
    271

    Default

    Umm is this driver same 9.4? I thought that it's still under NDA, hopefully they have official permission to share it, and if not hopefully AMD does not make a big number of it.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    3

    Default

    Is this release for X server 1.6 only or can it be installed for 1.5 (ubuntu 8.10 intrepid) too?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •