Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 44

Thread: IBM Buying Sun?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    102

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by alazyworkaholic View Post
    AFAIK Sun is the major sponsor of OpenOffice.org. What would happen to its development if Sun gets bought out? I've been a little worried about what might happen since Sun's market has been crunched by Linux. Would this be good or bad for OOo?
    Umm ... If IBM bought Sun OpenOffice would be in very safe hands ... have you google'd "IBM OpenOffice" ?

    IBM are big in the OASIS group that specified the standards by which OpenOffice works; In some areas OpenOffice is seen as IBM's baby, and the press believe that IBM are using OpenOffice as a stick to beat Microsoft.

    OpenOffice, MySQL and Java are the things that will definitely survive.

    I kinda hope that Solaris will continue and that AIX apps will be ported to it because Solaris is more mature and has more development (especailly with ZFS), especially since OpenSolaris has a PowerPC variant now, but that may be my wishful thinking.

    Problem with ZFS though is that IBM sell raid and storage solutions and ZFS does all that for free ... IBM might not like that hanging around ... Only thing in it's favour is that ZFS will hurt the competition too.

    One thing not mentioned (we have an ex-sun employee in our office, and he still likes Sun, but not the atmosphere that currently surrounds the place Sun still have 3 Billion in cash reserves, so if IBM buy it for 6 Billion they're getting a very good deal.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    187

    Default

    Note that IBM has been focusing more and more on software and services, and steadily divesting from hardware. I doubt that Sparc would survive in any form.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    160

    Default

    interesting idea. However I know from a reputable source at sun, that there is more and more support towards dropping opensolaris/solaris entirely and moving to linux.

    However this is not exactly likely to happen right now considering sun's higher echelons but worth noting. If a merger happen ibm might just do it.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    772

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by highlandsun View Post
    Note that IBM has been focusing more and more on software and services, and steadily divesting from hardware. I doubt that Sparc would survive in any form.
    An increased focus on software and services is precisely why I think SPARC could survive. Sun already took the big step of open-sourcing variants of the UltraSPARC T1 and T2 processors and related design/verification tools. It seems like a natural follow-up to provide software and services for users of those designs. Whether that's a viable plan in the larger context of the market is another matter, of course.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    160

    Default

    looks like this could be likely :

    http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/...ed-snaffle-sun

  6. #16
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,583

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lordmozilla View Post
    Heh, inquirer articles should always have a * on the quote saying

    * story may be full of bullshit if originating from inquirers "reliable sources"
    However with the NYT breaking the news there is more then likely some credibility to it.

    Back on topic, I can see IBM killing solaris and GPL'ing it's worthwhile assets (zfs, dtrace, etc).

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    102

    Default

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/04...eal_breakdown/

    And from the guy in my office who still owns Sun shares, the shareholders have said they want more money, and IBM have told them to get stuffed ...

    So this is off.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    160

    Default

    I got told that ibm retracted their bid, but that it would probably be back.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    102

    Default

    It's a good job this isn't eBay, otherwise you can get negative feedback for that

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    89

    Default

    Oh well.

    At least it isn't Apple trying to snatch them.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •