Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Ubuntu 9.04 Release Candidate Pushed Out

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,548

    Default Ubuntu 9.04 Release Candidate Pushed Out

    Phoronix: Ubuntu 9.04 Release Candidate Pushed Out

    We are just one week away from the release of Ubuntu 9.04 and with that it is now time for the Jaunty Jackalope release candidate. Ubuntu 9.04 features the GNOME 2.26 desktop, X Server 1.6, and the Linux 2.6.28 kernel...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=NzIxMg

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    84

    Default

    In American English, "release pushed out" means, "release delayed until a later date."

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by md1032 View Post
    In American English, "release pushed out" means, "release delayed until a later date."
    I thought the same thing when I saw the headline, heh. "pushed out to mirrors" or something would be more obvious.
    Last edited by kurros; 04-16-2009 at 06:11 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Province of Québec, Canada
    Posts
    52

    Smile

    That mean new frglx driver next week... just before new Ubuntu's release.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nico342 View Post
    That mean new frglx driver next week... just before new Ubuntu's release.

    Yes, but ... the new version of X.org (1.6) only supports Catalyst 9.4, which drops support for R3xx, R4xx and R5xx based chipsets. I'm running the Jaunty beta on a laptop I purchased a year and a half ago, and the X1200 chipset in it is now deprecated in the proprietary ATI driver.

    On the plus side, the open source ati driver looks better than ever and continues to improve. 2D acceleartion has never been better, and has what appears to be full support for "desktop effects". On the minus side, 3D support is "still in the works".

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Province of Québec, Canada
    Posts
    52

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zoward View Post
    Yes, but ... the new version of X.org (1.6) only supports Catalyst 9.4, which drops support for R3xx, R4xx and R5xx based chipsets. I'm running the Jaunty beta on a laptop I purchased a year and a half ago, and the X1200 chipset in it is now deprecated in the proprietary ATI driver.

    On the plus side, the open source ati driver looks better than ever and continues to improve. 2D acceleartion has never been better, and has what appears to be full support for "desktop effects". On the minus side, 3D support is "still in the works".
    My card is still supported on frglx (I have a 2400HD), I have anoying video tearings... maybe "RadeonHD" drivers will is better for HTPC... just a matter of time to switch.....

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    2

    Default X1200 chipset

    Quote Originally Posted by nico342 View Post
    My card is still supported on frglx (I have a 2400HD), I have anoying video tearings... maybe "RadeonHD" drivers wdriill is better for HTPC... just a matter of time to switch.....
    Alas, the X1200 chipset in my year-and-a-half old laptop is not, which leaves me in the vacuum between being supported by the proprietary driver, and having full 3D support on the open source driver ... unless I choose not to upgrade to Jaunty on my laptop ... Hmmm ...

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Province of Québec, Canada
    Posts
    52

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by zoward View Post
    Alas, the X1200 chipset in my year-and-a-half old laptop is not, which leaves me in the vacuum between being supported by the proprietary driver, and having full 3D support on the open source driver ... unless I choose not to upgrade to Jaunty on my laptop ... Hmmm ...
    So in fact I just want to be able to play "correctly" videos (I'm not playing game on my HTPC). I'm currently using XBMC and it so great for that. I'm just looking now for the best driver on video playback. Playing SD files and trying sometimes some lower HD files (720p).
    My machine is not really powerful but I'm pretty it might be enought (Intel Atom 330 1.6Ghz + ATI 2400HD pci).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •