Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 56

Thread: NVIDIA's Release Happiness Continues Into April

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    86

    Default

    So is the fact that us Linux users are having Nvidia vs ATi flame wars mean we're another step closer to being feature-complete with the Windows guys?

    All joking aside, I think a little flaming action is a good sign, because it's proof we have more than one legitimate option. Before ATi started their open source initiative, no one had a reason to like them.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Connecticut,USA
    Posts
    974

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GreatWalrus View Post
    I just beat it over the head with the open source ATI driver (which supports my "outdated" video card, unlike fglrx)
    Eventually Nouveau rather than nv driver will be handling the old cards so that people can still keep using them till they drop dead

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    192

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chaos386 View Post
    Before ATi started their open source initiative, no one had a reason to like them.[/SIZE]
    That's just the trouble isn't it. Its the only thing they have going for them. Still.

    Nvidia on the other hand seems to only have one thing against them. The evil closed blob.

    So what it comes down to is you do this balancing act between what's philosophically better for you vs something that, imo, is more tangible such as functionality and features.

    Just about every Linux ATI vs NV flame war I've ever seen comes down to

    Nathan: Mine works.
    Jack: Mine's open.

    Jack argues his point to no end even though he uses fglrx. Nathan alt+tabs out of his game (running thanks to Wine) to laugh at Jack.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    51

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy View Post
    That's just the trouble isn't it. Its the only thing they have going for them. Still.

    Nvidia on the other hand seems to only have one thing against them. The evil closed blob.

    So what it comes down to is you do this balancing act between what's philosophically better for you vs something that, imo, is more tangible such as functionality and features.

    Just about every Linux ATI vs NV flame war I've ever seen comes down to

    Nathan: Mine works.
    Jack: Mine's open.

    Jack argues his point to no end even though he uses fglrx. Nathan alt+tabs out of his game (running thanks to Wine) to laugh at Jack.
    Nice story man.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Under the bridge
    Posts
    2,149

    Default

    As of Catalyst 9.3, fglrx delivers excellent OpenGL performance (I actually get measure better FPS on Linux than on Vista, way to go!)

    As workstation cards, Ati on Linux is very competitive both hardware- and performance-wise. As consumer cards (I want Compiz & Wine, wee!) they are not up to par yet. As far as openness is concerned, Ati fares much better than Nvidia.

    In other words, pick the card that performs best to your needs.

    Point in case: my father's PC (internet, Compiz & videos) uses a fanless Nvidia 7600GS. My fallback box (internet, Compiz & videos) has an Ati X1950 running on the open drivers. My main box (3d programming and modeling) sports an Ati 4850.

    All three work just fine.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    58

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackStar View Post
    As of Catalyst 9.3, fglrx delivers excellent OpenGL performance (I actually get measure better FPS on Linux than on Vista, way to go!)
    Don't forget to mention that XV still crashes when you go to fullscreen, you get odd video effects with XV and composite, and occasionally X won't start.

    <Sarcasm>
    But when it does, man, that framerate is great. It really makes that 1 out of 20 times that things work with fglrx just so worth it.
    </Sarcasm>

  7. #27
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,587

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackStar View Post
    As of Catalyst 9.3, fglrx delivers excellent OpenGL performance (I actually get measure better FPS on Linux than on Vista, way to go!)

    Measured with? With ATI's recent history of not rendering full scenes again it wouldn't be surprising that the linux binary is actually rendering less. Also what modes were you running in? What were the renderers? Ogl, DX9, DX10? Have you taken screenshots of both screens to compare?

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Merida
    Posts
    1,113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deanjo View Post
    Measured with? With ATI's recent history of not rendering full scenes again it wouldn't be surprising that the linux binary is actually rendering less. Also what modes were you running in? What were the renderers? Ogl, DX9, DX10? Have you taken screenshots of both screens to compare?

    Nexuiz runs identical in Windows XP and Ubuntu. Same for Alien Arena.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,587

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Melcar View Post
    Nexuiz runs identical in Windows XP and Ubuntu. Same for Alien Arena.
    That's not surprising. Nexiuz isn't exactly a game that pushes systems hard.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Merida
    Posts
    1,113

    Default

    Yeah sure.

    Windows XP:

    36 61 139

    Ubuntu 8.10:

    36 66 181

    Ultimate preset. Only settings on CCC being forced on both OS' are mipmaps (High) and Catalyst AI (Advanced). Latest end-user drivers.
    Alien Arena performs identical on both OS' with the same settings. The same goes for Urban Terror and Warsow. Furmark (running under Wine in Ubuntu) gives out the same scores.

    Fglrx has good 3D performance. No surprise really. Where it sucks is in common desktop situations, specially when you try to accelerate them. Again, no surprise given where the driver comes from. These issues are being worked on. Sure, even I would like all these things fixed as quickly as possible, but given that the codebase is rather "new", the delays are understandable.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •