Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 41

Thread: Intel Core i7 On Linux

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kano View Post
    Very interesting is the Parallel BZIP2 Compression test which is much faster on my test system. The kernel is basically the same, just the basesystem is Debian 5.0.
    Seams to be one of the cases, where the i7 really sucks. Another extreme example of this is the Windows game "Bioshock", where the 3 GHz i7 gets beaten by an 2,33 GHz C2Q. Overall for gaming the 220 Phenom II 940 isn't slower than the 560 Core i7 940...

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    270

    Default

    Typo on page 1

    We were able to push this processor any further than 3.60GHz with this motherboard and the stock cooling before running into stability problems.
    It should be We were not...

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    160

    Default

    a direct comparison to a Q9xxx/Q6xxx quad core cpu's would have been great. Not to mention a Phenom II thrown in there.

    Also is there a way of disabling HT and trying again? I would love to see the performance gains from this new generation of hyperthreading.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    NYC, New Haven
    Posts
    3

    Default Possible Benchmark Improvements

    It would be nice to see a low-end and a high-end CPU also compared on the same test bed in the dual-core and quad-core categories.

    Additionally, one could try to make comparisons with Windows and Mac to see which operating systems take advantage of new features like added cores and sse3-sse4.1 best.

    To mention nothing about AMD.

    I know this is tough since many sites (Tom's Hardware comes to mind) benchmark processors in Windows, but comparatively few do on Linux!

  5. #25

    Default

    Rarely do I post here anymore.

    Quote Originally Posted by gtrawoger View Post
    People, you are missing the idea. What Michael wants you to do is post YOUR results from YOUR setup.

    That way, when someone post his from a Q9XXX, you will know. You can't expect Michael to have all those processors.

    As soon as I get Phoronix Test Suite installed, I will post.
    I agree in the sense of the community generating meaningful results itself; results which can then be compared against each other. But, I think most people here, myself included, were hoping for something in the article to compare it against. After all, not everyone has the same OS configuration, nor Phoronix Test Suite, nor Linux for that matter. What about the audience looking for i7 Linux performance who 1) have never used it, and 2) don't have an i7 but may be considering buying one & installing Linux on that rig (or any single part of that)?

    Don't get me wrong. I love the Phoronix Test Suite for what it is, and I'm very grateful to Michael for providing this critical piece of software for free. Also, I have no reason to believe Michael isn't acting with his best intentions. However, I'm with everyone else on this issue: It's hard to make a judgment call with just one chip that's been overclocked.

    (tl;dr) Put shortly: Perhaps a follow-up article with community-submitted benches of comparable systems would be something Michael could consider.

    just my 2c.

    (btw, didn't mean to single you out, gtrawoger. nothing personal!)

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    71

    Default

    meh ... no offense taken. I just thought I'd point out the intent of Michael's providing the command for the test. I actually thought it would be a pretty neat idea to have the community provide some benchmarks from their rigs and have larger pool of stats to pull from.

    Now, all we'd need now is a way to make something out of that data.

  7. #27

    Default

    So, I installed Wallbuntu 9.04 Beta 1 on some spare space I had on this HDD here.


    The benchmark results may be found here: http://global.phoronix-test-suite.co...6937-12014-280

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    325

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lordmozilla View Post
    Also is there a way of disabling HT and trying again? I would love to see the performance gains from this new generation of hyperthreading.
    Assuming there is one...

    The problem with Hyperthreading on multi-core is the scheduler needs to know which cores are virtual and which are not. As the whole point of hyperthreading is to hide such information...

    Virtual cores sounds great in theory, but don't always work out. It is possible to get a scenario where the schedulers mess up and load 4 threads on 2 cores, and the two virtual cores, and leave the other two cores unloaded. This is not a problem once you hit 8+ threads (strictly speaking 7+), or when you only have one seriously heavy load thread, but any where in between there is scope to get it wrong. On a single core system, this is, of course, totally irrelevant as it isn't actually possible to assign processes to the "wrong" core.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    206

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RobbieAB View Post
    Assuming there is one...

    The problem with Hyperthreading on multi-core is the scheduler needs to know which cores are virtual and which are not. As the whole point of hyperthreading is to hide such information...
    The linux kernel is aware of the difference between real and virtual cores and tries to schedule with those in mind. That was added back when the P4 went hyperthreaded.

    The core i7 is more super scalar than the P4 and should be able to scale much better.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    206

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by downhillgames View Post
    So, I installed Wallbuntu 9.04 Beta 1 on some spare space I had on this HDD here.


    The benchmark results may be found here: http://global.phoronix-test-suite.co...6937-12014-280
    Ugh, original phenom.

    Below is a full battery of tests from a phenom2 x3 which seems to generally outperform your original phenom.

    http://global.phoronix-test-suite.co...76-29519-12230

    If anything, the global test results database is a PITA to navigate. I tend to agree with most folks on here. Benchmarking a single platform is about useless. An existing frame of reference...*some* frame of reference would be nice.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •