Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 56

Thread: Ubuntu 64-bit More Competitive Against Mac OS X

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,438

    Default Ubuntu 64-bit More Competitive Against Mac OS X

    Phoronix: Ubuntu 64-bit More Competitive Against Mac OS X

    Last week we published Ubuntu 9.04 vs. Mac OS X 10.5.6 benchmarks where we compared the performance of these two popular operating systems on a Mac Mini. With the OS X kernel currently being 32-bit but with support for 64-bit applications, we had used the 32-bit version of Ubuntu 9.04. In a majority of the Leopard operating system from Apple outperformed Canonical's Jaunty Jackalope, but today we are adding in the results from an Ubuntu 64-bit installation. As you can see from the results, the x86_64 version of Ubuntu Linux is more competitive against Mac OS X 10.5.6.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=13838

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    83

    Default

    Thanks good article! Really intressting...most ppl say there is no use in 64bit OS, only that it can use more RAM. Atleast I can point at something when I say it does perform better.

  3. #3

    Default

    Thanks VERY much for next Ext3 benchmark... Who's interested in Ext4?

    About this 'regression' fixed in 2.6.29. Regression is probably in GCC or in some library (maybe this also explains why *BSD and Open Solaris aren't performance monsters in PB) and there's only workaround in 2.6.29. If there was regression in Linux kernel many people will complain about it and Linux devs test kernel themselves. If there's even only 2% performance drop they take care of this.
    Last edited by kraftman; 05-18-2009 at 06:04 AM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by conholster View Post
    Thanks good article! Really intressting...most ppl say there is no use in 64bit OS, only that it can use more RAM. Atleast I can point at something when I say it does perform better.
    The major difference (which these benchs show) is the use of SSE by default in x86_64, which is way faster than x87 floating point unit.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    192

    Default

    Lies, damned lies, and the statistics:

    Seven of the 29 tests changed their winner/loser status for Ubuntu by switching from 32 to 64-bit. Six tests became winners for Ubuntu 64 and 1 became a loser.

    Overall,
    12 wins for Mac OS X,
    4 wins for Ubuntu 32, and
    13 wins for Ubuntu 64.

    Ubuntu 64 wins.


    I think if the graphics and SQLite performance were fixed then there really wouldn't be much of a performance gap for most desktop users to care about.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy View Post
    I think if the graphics and SQLite performance were fixed then there really wouldn't be much of a performance gap for most desktop users to care about.
    There isn't any gap in SQLite. If you switch to Ext 4 you should see a huge improvement in this test. In real world benchmarks OS X doesn't have a chance with any of Big Three (Linux, FreeBSD, Solaris). An only area where OS X is better is graphics, but probably only when you don't use binary blobs on Linux (however 2D performance should still be better on OS X).

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Die trolls, die!
    Posts
    525

    Default

    cool but the current osx version is 10.5.7

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Posts
    850

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rip-Rip View Post
    The major difference (which these benchs show) is the use of SSE by default in x86_64, which is way faster than x87 floating point unit.
    Actually, 64-bit code even uses SSE2 as all x86_64 CPUs are SSE2 capable. To test your theory, one could compare a source based distro (eg. Gentoo) which was compiled with such optimization against a non-optimized distro.

    That being said, encryption and video encoding tests also benefit from the additional x86_64 registers, so I expect that 32 bit code will still perform worse.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    5

    Default

    and to think that *ANY* other distro beats ubuntu hands down in performance...

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bugmenot View Post
    cool but the current osx version is 10.5.7
    It would be cool to see Ubuntu x86_64 using Ext 4 (possible?) vs OS X 10.5.7 and both using same version of GCC.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •