The 4GB write performance is really interesting, but why this 7z compression regression?![]()
Phoronix: Linux 2.6.30 Kernel Benchmarks
With the Linux 2.6.30 kernel being prepped for release in early June, we have set out to provide a few benchmarks of this latest Linux kernel to see how it compares to its two earlier predecessors. While this new kernel may offer support for new file-systems (NILFS2, in particular), support for LZMA/BZIP2 kernel image compression, a new CPU architecture (Microblaze) and many other changes, are there any major performance regressions or improvements like we have spotted with our previous Linux kernel benchmarks?
http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=13891
The 4GB write performance is really interesting, but why this 7z compression regression?![]()
It would be really interesting if some kernel developers looked at the regressions and bisected them.
Hell, I might even do it myself if I find the time this weekend.
It would add a lot to the article if you could at least attempt to explain the instances where there are large performance changes.
So? fat ones are beautiful![]()
I have been running this kernel for a few days on Ubuntu Intrepid and it 'feels' faster than 2.6.28 from a desktop usage standpoint.
My main drive is encrypted, so maybe I am just seeing performance improvements similar to GnuPG benchmark, but either way I like it.
These test should be done with 64bit too. On gentoo, we found 2.6.30 over 600% faster in most intensive I/O load (like decompression). A 3 years old (introduced in 2.6.16) regression have been fixed.