Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 32

Thread: Google Chrome For Linux Arrives, In Dev Form

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Under the bridge
    Posts
    2,129

    Default

    Chrome is very fast in javascript, but *much* less than stellar in plain web content (html, css, images). Try zooming or scrolling an image-heavy webpage, for example. Opera 9.6/10 slaughters Chrome (and Firefox) on such pages.

    Not to mention Opera's "fit to width" functionality that makes zooming actually useful. Try zooming Phoronix by 20% - see that horizontal scrollbar? How do you feel, browsing like this? Now try with Opera; press Ctrl-F11. That's a genuinely useful feature noone has dared copy yet (simply because it is quite difficult to get right - as Opera has managed to do).

  2. #22

    Default

    @BlackStar

    Try zooming or scrolling an image-heavy webpage, for example. Opera 9.6/10 slaughters Chrome (and Firefox) on such pages.
    Thanks to QT4...

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Columbus, OH, USA
    Posts
    323

    Default

    Took a little fiddling to get it installed properly, but it's not too bad. It's definitely speedy.

    Too bad there's no 64-bit build, though; I'm pretty pissed that they're pretending it is.

    Oh yeah, Gentoo users wanting to give this a shot, I offer up the fruits of my labour:
    www-client/google-chrome-unstable-3.0.183.1.ebuild
    http://dpaste.com/51790/

    Have fun, lol.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Under the bridge
    Posts
    2,129

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kraftman View Post
    @BlackStar

    Thanks to QT4...
    Nope, using QT3-amd64-static build here.

    As far as I know, Opera does not use QT4 for page rendering or for its UI, just for its file dialogs. The UI is completely custom.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ethana2 View Post
    "Installing Google Chrome will add the Google repository so your system will automatically keep Chrome up to date."

    Finally, a third party package you can install and keep up to date without rubbing your head, patting your belly, and dancing a jig.

    Without proper apturl infrastructure built into ubuntu, more and more packages will modify /etc/apt/sources.list until it's just the accepted way of doing things.
    Thank you -- this is what I've been trying to say for years!

  6. #26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackStar View Post
    Nope, using QT3-amd64-static build here.

    As far as I know, Opera does not use QT4 for page rendering or for its UI, just for its file dialogs. The UI is completely custom.
    That's even better, because QT3 is better accelerated right now

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    197

    Default

    If only it has adblock and noscript. I hate d'em google ads

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,067

    Default

    No thanks.

    a) bad browser
    b) from google
    c) calls home (partly same as b)

  9. #29

    Default Download for RPM distributions

    You can download the binaries (I'm using opensuse 11.2 factory and opensuse 11.1) here:
    build.chromium.org/buildbot/snapshots/chromium-rel-linux/

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Connecticut,USA
    Posts
    956

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kano View Post
    The hugest problem with chrome is that no java + flash plugins are unusable. Tested it 5 min and removed it. I even tried to cp the flash plugin manually to the plugins dir, showed flash in aboutlugins but youtube did not work.
    Guess firefox-style plugin support is not ready yet

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •