Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Intel Releases Support For New, Unreleased IGP

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,693

    Default Intel Releases Support For New, Unreleased IGP

    Phoronix: Intel Releases Support For New, Unreleased IGP

    Last year Intel had launched the GMA X4500HD integrated graphics processor as a nice upgrade to their G3x series. Our Linux results found these chipsets with Intel integrated graphics to perform better than past Intel IGPs, but still was limited in what games and tests could run on the G43/45 hardware with the open-source Intel Linux driver stack...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=NzMxNQ

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    3

    Default

    Still waiting on that mythical video acceleration Intel...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    17

    Default

    Is there any plan to implement H264/VC1 hardware acceleration (available on GMA4500 hardware) on the driver anytime soon?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    3

    Default

    A couple of Intel guys spoke about it earlier this year, but to be honest, it didn't sound promising for anything until at least 2010.

    They've been talking about it a long time but with no results. I'll be pretty disappointed if they bring out a new chipset, then only support accelerated playback on that rather than the G4x as well.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,683

    Default

    Looks like CPU integrated gfx for i5:

    http://pci-ids.ucw.cz/read/PC/8086/0042

    http://pci-ids.ucw.cz/read/PC/8086/0046

    Those are basically G45 - so do not expect major driver changes.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    714

    Default

    There is also the new Atom Pinetrail platform. Were they got rid of the Northbridge and sucked its functionality into the south bridge and moved the graphics into the processor.

    Made the GPU a core on the CPU, more or less.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,683

    Default

    Yes, but that is definitely not supported by the commit mentioned in the article.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    714

    Default

    Thats to bad. I am paranoid that the Atom PineTrail stuff is going to end up like the GMA 500 and require proprietary drivers.

    I haven't heard much information on whether its GMA stuff or if its PowerVR stuff.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    983

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noisymime View Post
    A couple of Intel guys spoke about it earlier this year, but to be honest, it didn't sound promising for anything until at least 2010.

    They've been talking about it a long time but with no results. I'll be pretty disappointed if they bring out a new chipset, then only support accelerated playback on that rather than the G4x as well.
    I wouldn't be surprised if accelerated video playback is the next big target for Intel. They have been working hard with KMS/DRI2/GEM/UXA etc. for quite a while now and that's just about finished.

    Would be nice if Phoronix could do an interview with a couple of Intel devs about their plans.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    86

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by drag View Post
    Thats to bad. I am paranoid that the Atom PineTrail stuff is going to end up like the GMA 500 and require proprietary drivers.

    I haven't heard much information on whether its GMA stuff or if its PowerVR stuff.
    GMA 500 only needs proprietary drivers because it's not actually an Intel GPU. It's PowerVR, so all the IP is licensed from a third party (Imagination Technologies) and thus isn't Intel's to open up. Anything developed in-house wouldn't have that problem.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •