Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 31

Thread: As It Stands, Ubuntu Has No Issues With Mono

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    13,398

    Default As It Stands, Ubuntu Has No Issues With Mono

    Phoronix: As It Stands, Ubuntu Has No Issues With Mono

    On behalf of Canonical and the Ubuntu Technical Board, Scott James Remnant has issued a position statement surrounding Mono, the open-source project that provides a C# compiler for Linux (along with other operating systems) and other components for a free software .NET stack. However, the legality of Mono is frequently a key concern to free software advocates considering patents and other intellectual property that's owned by Microsoft...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=NzM1Nw

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    598

    Default

    M$ is going to use anything it can to hurt Linux.

    When Mono projects are vital parts of Linux, they start the trouble.

    Just wait.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    233

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Louise View Post
    M$ is going to use anything it can to hurt Linux.

    When Mono projects are vital parts of Linux, they start the trouble.

    Just wait.
    You are right, why should they make trouble now if the can wait and make it when more people use it.

    Hopeful Mono will never be a important piece of linux.

    What I don't understand, why did Debian include Tomboy (which requires Mono) into the default desktop install http://robertmh.wordpress.com/2009/0...fault-install/, if they can use the same app, Gnomte in C++ without Mono?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    116

    Default

    I think this is a foolish move by Canonical.
    Time will tell I guess.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    598

    Default

    Yes, Mono will be a very powerful weapon against Linux. In fact M$ are in complete control.

    I hope Red Hat make a statement about Mono. They are always very careful, and don't include anything with a potential patent or license issue.

    What is Gnome and KDE's take on Mono? Do they have Mono programs in their suites?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    233

    Default

    I read somewhere that Gnome choose some Mono programs to be included in there desktop.

    I don't know any KDE apps that uses Mono!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    598

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KDesk View Post
    I read somewhere that Gnome choose some Mono programs to be included in there desktop.
    It is

    http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyseven/Bindings/

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    21

    Default

    I thought most of the .net stack was opened after standardization. Also, I don't think the software patents microsoft holds on .net will stand up in court, at least in most of europe. Might be wrong there though, but I thought europe at least is far more strict when it come to software patents

  9. #9

    Default

    As far as I know, Mono is not used for any common KDE programs. Most of them seem to be written in either C++ or a scripting language like Python. I think it should stay that way. I can see the day (quite easily) when Micro$h!t destroys GNOME because of all the Mono they plan to include. KDE is being smart, as always, and not including it.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    114

    Default

    I don't see enough benefit over Java with C# and Mono to make it worth the risk.

    At least Java has something resembling a diverse community of interests moving it forward, rather than just the limited interests of one company.

    Sun provides Java under the GPL themselves, directly licensing any patents they (the creators) have over the technology. Novell may also ship their Mono implementation under the GPL, but not being the creators of the technology, they can't give a license to patents they don't own!

    It's also worth mentioning that neither the ECMA nor ISO (through which .NET was standardized) require any patent disclosure (let alone a libre grant) on a submission being standardized!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •