Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: NVIDIA Issues An Open-Source Driver Update

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,648

    Default NVIDIA Issues An Open-Source Driver Update

    Phoronix: NVIDIA Issues An Open-Source Driver Update

    NVIDIA's Aaron Plattner has just announced the release of the xf86-video-nv 2.1.14 driver, but does it have anything in store? Not really. The NVIDIA open-source X.Org driver update brings support for a couple of new ASICs, fixed mode-setting for some NVIDIA GPUs, and other fixes, but nothing too exciting.....

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=NzM2MQ

  2. #2

    Default

    I really wish nVidia would de classify the specs for some of their older hardware so that users out there who still had the older stuff could get drivers made for their wares.

    I like open source but I understand the need for nVidia to keep it's secrets hidden away from the likes of intel and ati. They have a right........ in light of competition.

    I know I wouldn't bother to sink a bunch of money into a new technology if I couldn't use it as an advantage against my business rivals.

    But for the older stuff, say two or three generations back, it should be fine.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Under the bridge
    Posts
    2,153

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by halfmanhalfamazing View Post
    I like open source but I understand the need for nVidia to keep it's secrets hidden away from the likes of intel and ati. They have a right........ in light of competition.

    I know I wouldn't bother to sink a bunch of money into a new technology if I couldn't use it as an advantage against my business rivals.

    But for the older stuff, say two or three generations back, it should be fine.
    Your argument doesn't really hold water... AMD opened their specs for their latest and greatest GPUs - did that put them into a competitive disadvantage? I'd say it did the exact opposite: buying AMD hardware makes more sense now that we are not dependent on the whims of the closed-source binaries.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,333

    Default

    AFAIK the Utah-GLX devs had Nvidia docs under NDA for the Rivas and early Geforces. Wonder what happened to those.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    3,046

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by curaga View Post
    AFAIK the Utah-GLX devs had Nvidia docs under NDA for the Rivas and early Geforces. Wonder what happened to those.
    They're still there for the taking over at the SourceForge repository.

    But the codebase was for the Riva series of adapters- and you'd have quite a bit of work to re-work the drivers, especially without the docs, to work under DRI/Mesa or Gallium3D/Mesa as they're rather specific to Utah-GLX and you'd have to know what the code was doing to be able to crib from it and it's not useful past the Riva series.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,353

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by curaga View Post
    AFAIK the Utah-GLX devs had Nvidia docs under NDA for the Rivas and early Geforces. Wonder what happened to those.
    Intel and Microsoft jointly threatened to sue them for releasing documentation about licensed IP they were using at the time. I'm not sure about the details exactly, but I understand that nvidia pulled the documentation, and then canceled the plans for the open driver. I believe it was at that time that nVidia decided to go whole hog on its own closed driver.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,675

    Default

    In a perfect world this would be really fine. But i don't think that will happen soon. The oss driver provides basic 2d acc and xv - the same you get now for ati r600/r700 gpus. For full speed you are forced in both cases to install binary drivers.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Posts
    858

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kano View Post
    The oss driver provides basic 2d acc and xv - the same you get now for ati r600/r700 gpus.
    That is not entirely accurate, the xf86-video-nv driver has xv acceleration only for older chips. It will probably never have xv on current and future generation chips. See this thread for details. OTOH, xf86-video-ati/radeonhd support xv on all Radeon GPUs.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,806

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kano View Post
    In a perfect world this would be really fine. But i don't think that will happen soon. The oss driver provides basic 2d acc and xv - the same you get now for ati r600/r700 gpus. For full speed you are forced in both cases to install binary drivers.
    In official releases yes, in the development trees there's drivers for r600/r700 some people can already play OpenGL games with. And it's getting better all the time.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,675

    Default

    I don't know anybody who does not install the binary driver anyway. I made a script to do so that even works in live mode with Debian/Ubuntu live images - on hd install of course too. I guess that's easy enough.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •