Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 55

Thread: An Updated ATI Kernel Mode-Setting Driver

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,782

    Default An Updated ATI Kernel Mode-Setting Driver

    Phoronix: An Updated ATI Kernel Mode-Setting Driver

    The Linux 2.6.31 kernel will be released within the next month or so and one of the new features in this release is the long-awaited integration of the TTM memory manager and then appearing as a staging driver in this kernel is an ATI kernel mode-setting driver. This KMS driver doesn't yet support the newer R600/R700 GPUs, but it does support the R500 series and will be used by default in the forthcoming release of Fedora 12. While the Linux 2.6.31-rc5 kernel should be released at any point now and the development is quickly winding down on this kernel, David Airlie is trying to push in a significant ATI KMS driver update into this kernel...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=NzQxOA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    57

    Default Getting funnier by the second

    LOL...news to alert me that in a month (or so) my card still won't be supported

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    437

    Default

    When will the KMS for R600 supported? please?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,132

    Default

    1. Is Mesa 7.6 needed for GEM/DRI2/KMS for R1xx-R5xx?
    2. Is there a rough schedule for the Mesa 7.6 release?
    3. Is there a chance to include R6xx/R/xx stuff in time for Linux 2.6.32?

    Thanks.

    And thanks to the developers!

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    PL
    Posts
    910

    Default

    well i don't see any problems against pulling these updates into mainline.

    after all ati kms is in staging - which means it's experimental code. there should be no problems with pulling those updates, since only those users who know what they are doing will use these drivers.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yoshi314 View Post
    well i don't see any problems against pulling these updates into mainline.

    after all ati kms is in staging - which means it's experimental code. there should be no problems with pulling those updates, since only those users who know what they are doing will use these drivers.
    It depends if other Kernel parts have to be modified, but it seems it's only radeon related:

    http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/29/41

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    598

    Default

    When KMS is stable, how much work will it likely take to make a root-less X server?

    1 month? 3 months? 6 months? 12 months?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    France
    Posts
    306

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Louise View Post
    When KMS is stable, how much work will it likely take to make a root-less X server?

    1 month? 3 months? 6 months? 12 months?
    Last time I tried KMS, it was already almost stable. So, with theses patchs, I guess this should be stable enough to be used by users who know what they are doing
    Also, it should be available in the 2.6.32 that should be out within 3 months.

    Concerning root-less X server, my bet that it is already stable but not in good-enough shape to enter the X-server mainline

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    598

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MPF View Post
    Last time I tried KMS, it was already almost stable. So, with theses patchs, I guess this should be stable enough to be used by users who know what they are doing
    Can KMS be used together with the Catalyst drivers?

    Quote Originally Posted by MPF View Post
    Concerning root-less X server, my bet that it is already stable but not in good-enough shape to enter the X-server mainline
    So it doesn't require a major rewrite of X to make it root-less?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    257

    Default

    hi, my first post, uuh exciting ;-)

    and a stupid question of course...

    its explicitly said that support for r500 cards is provided...
    what about r300? does it include that chipset and previous ones?

    great job
    thx

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •