Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 36

Thread: AMD Publishes New Chipset Documents

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    51

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by unimatrix View Post
    Hey nVidia, can you guess which video card I'm going to buy next?
    Wait there, don't take that step too soon, still the oss drivers sucks for newer cards, no power management and a lot of useful features are nowhere to be seen. 3D sucks and all of that.

    Maybe in a year or so they will be good oss drivers but not yet. If you switch you will be another of the AMD/ATI depressed users.

    Now, I really like this announcement, because that documentation benefits my chipset, and I sure hope the oss drivers get better for me now, they are improving, and are getting there but still there is like a year or 2 until they are the best oss graphic drivers.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Toronto/North Bay Canada
    Posts
    877

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by unimatrix View Post
    Hey nVidia, can you guess which video card I'm going to buy next?
    S3 540gtx?

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,641

    Default

    I don't see a reason to switch gfx card - you usually don't boot from a gfx card A Phenom II as testsystem for Coreboot would be nice, i don't like outdated slow systems. But i guess OC would not possible with CB.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Die trolls, die!
    Posts
    525

    Default

    Of course we switch the manufacturer of the graphics card not because of the graphics card but we like the open source politics amd is doing!

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    983

    Default

    What's the latest about CoreBoot on Intel platforms?

    I seem to recall hearing they're nowhere near as open about this as they are when it comes to GPUs. Is this still the case today? Are there any petitions or lobbying going on to convince them otherwise?

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Berlin, Germany
    Posts
    834

    Default

    Be aware that buying a random 780G mobo now and expecting it to be perfectly supported in coreboot soon will probably lead to disappointment.

    Coreboot supports only a select few mobos, namely the ones that are owned by the coreboot developers and/or where manufacturers have been cooperative enough. So if you are interested in coreboot it would be wise to wait which mobos are going to receive support at all.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    365

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by whizse View Post
    What's the latest about CoreBoot on Intel platforms?

    I seem to recall hearing they're nowhere near as open about this as they are when it comes to GPUs. Is this still the case today? Are there any petitions or lobbying going on to convince them otherwise?
    They are still as mostly unsupported at they were a year ago. Support has been added for some _mobile_ Intel Core 2 Duo chipset, but apart from that I haven't seen any change in the Socket 775 area.

    I wonder how come Intel is such a nice player in OSS graphics but not for coreboot

  8. #18
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,584

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NeoBrain View Post
    They are still as mostly unsupported at they were a year ago. Support has been added for some _mobile_ Intel Core 2 Duo chipset, but apart from that I haven't seen any change in the Socket 775 area.

    I wonder how come Intel is such a nice player in OSS graphics but not for coreboot
    3 letters why...... EFI

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,641

    Default

    Now also SFI for Atom MIDs.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    2

    Default

    Hi lads, it would be good if ati linux users who have "old" graphic cards make a undersigned(I don't know if this is the correct word(google translate)) to AMD to they make patches to the old 9.3 catalyst driver be compatible with xserver 1.6 and, possibly, to new kernels. This could be just for while radeon/radeonhd opensource drivers aren't ready enough to manage video-out ports and 3d resources fully.
    I confess the impression AMD gave to me is that they don't care for their product users, and I've my notebook with radeon x1250/690M for less than one year. I, and I believe a lot of people, want to have the lastests resources that new distros, apps, games and bugfixes that depends of newer kernels(not only of the graphic card world) could give, if the situation won't change the "neigbhor's garden will always be greener"....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •