Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Thread: Catalyst 9.8 - "compiz default maximize" = effect significant lag

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    38

    Question Catalyst 9.8 - "compiz default maximize" = effect significant lag

    Does anyone else experience a HUGE lag/stutter when you maximize a window with compiz enabled? Other effects such as "wobbly windows" is rendered without problems. But the 'maxmize/unmaximize" effect is terribly laggy.

    Config:
    Ubuntu 9.04
    01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV770 [Radeon HD 4870]
    Linux fermmy 2.6.28-15-server #49-Ubuntu SMP Tue Aug 18 19:30:06 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux
    Latest Catalyst 9.8 fglrx driver:
    fglrx-amdcccle_8.640-0ubuntu1_i386.deb
    fglrx-kernel-source_8.640-0ubuntu1_i386.deb
    fglrx-modaliases_8.640-0ubuntu1_i386.deb
    libamdxvba1_8.640-0ubuntu1_i386.deb
    xorg-driver-fglrx_8.640-0ubuntu1_i386.deb

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,763

    Default

    Yes, everyone has that. It's an old problem. And there's no work-around other that patching xorg with 107_fedora_dont_backfill_bg_none.patch (which will result in some temporary screen garbage while opening and maximizing windows/menus/lists/etc.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    38

    Default

    Oh I see. Good to know.

    So what is the problem then? A bug in X (which we need to wait to be fixed and come downstream to Ubuntu), or a bug in fglrx (which we need to wait for ATI to fix).

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,567

    Default

    By RealNC's answer it sounds like the real answer is "developers don't yet know where the real problem is". You can't fix what you cannot understand.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    38

    Default

    Interesting. Well, I can confirm that the problem does not exist with the open source radeon driver ... so that might narrow it down to a problem with fglrx, (maybe). heh

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,763

    Default

    fglrx doesn't seem to accelerate something in X that assumes the driver offers EXA support (fglrx uses the old XAA acceleration). If you take the open drivers and switch to XAA, you will have the same problem.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    38

    Default

    So is there a bug report submitted to XServer, or should we expect a workaround from fglrx?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,763

    Default

    I've no idea what the situation is. There was a lot of "ping-pong" the last time I looked it up (X saying it's the driver's problem, Ubuntu saying it's an X problem, ATI saying they have no idea and don't really care go patch your X since they don't really support upstream X...)

    It isn't pretty

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RealNC View Post
    I've no idea what the situation is. There was a lot of "ping-pong" the last time I looked it up (X saying it's the driver's problem, Ubuntu saying it's an X problem, ATI saying they have no idea and don't really care go patch your X since they don't really support upstream X...)

    It isn't pretty
    they care about in catalyst 9.10 ... but yes ubuntu 9.10 is still broken.

    i mean broken in meaning of broken...

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,712

    Default

    the problem is known. But ati devs say it's X fault, X devs say it is ati's fault.

    Interessting tidbit: nvidia has/had the same problem, also by that change that is reversed with the patch. And this change was introduced to make intel less horrible. Most X devs have something to do with Intel.

    You can think about that for a moment.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •