Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: MB with ATI Radeon HD 4200 using sideport memory *only*

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,641

    Default

    No, they are not. Currently the memory has a high bandwith, for low 3d speed purpose they are good, other apps run about the same speed as without.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,514

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Enemy View Post
    hmm...


    So, should I avoid buying MB with sideport at all? As I understand it can give me (i'm not a gamer) only driver problems?
    I don't see sideport memory causing driver problems, I just don't happen to know off the top of my head if the Catalyst Linux driver makes use of it today. I think it does, just not sure.

    IGPs give you a nice inexpensive graphics solution. You won't get as much performance as a discrete graphics card but you pay a lot less as well. Sideport memory gives you another option - a bit more performance for a bit more money, but still less expensive than the cheapest discrete graphics card.

    In terms of whether to get a board with sideport, I think the question is whether you are likely to upgrade your system by adding a discrete card in the future. If you are, then I wouldn't bother with sideport and save the few $$ for your upgrade GPU. If you are likely to stay with the graphics on the IGP, then sideport memory can give better performance and at least slightly reduce the load on system memory.
    Last edited by bridgman; 09-12-2009 at 11:21 AM.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kano View Post
    No, they are not. Currently the memory has a high bandwith, for low 3d speed purpose they are good, other apps run about the same speed as without.
    thats a pure lie! ... with a true VGA the CPU will always be faster.

    in other words you can buy cheap slow ram because there is much lower overhead to deliver data from the ram by the cpu into the IGP...
    Last edited by Qaridarium; 09-12-2009 at 11:37 AM.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,641

    Default

    It is a tiny bit slower, but not that extreme with ddr2/3 in dual channel. There the base speed is high enough. Some nv onboard only handle single channel that will decrease speed a bit. But usally memory thruput is high enough for the cpu that you will not notice the difference. You do not save minutes when you add a gfx card when you compile a kernel or so. You can compare that like when you would use cheap standard memory and somebody else uses oc memory. You only see the diff in memory benchmarks.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1

    Default

    I have an Asus m3n78-t with the 790gx and I only use the sideport memory and it runs great. I did notice a lot of corruption when I was using both sideport and ram, until I noticed the speeds the memories were running at -- I overclocked my ram to run at the same speed as the sideport, and voila, no more corruption.

    I like my ram so I only run on sideport but its fast enough to run everything smoothly without too much harm on the CPU. When running with PCI-E 7950-GX2 with videos load, cpu is at ~20-30%.

    Same thing with the integrated AMD 3300HD cpu is ~30-40%, so its not top of the line, nor does it have a gig of vram, but it works.

    Its a great board, don't know about the 4200 but there are FGLRX drivers so it will probably work.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •