Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 42

Thread: AMD Catalyst 9.9 Released !

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    São Paulo, Brazil
    Posts
    73

    Default

    Yet another buggy piece of shit.
    Texture corruption all around. Even worst than it was with 9.8. Well, I think I'll have to go back to 9.7. This was the last version that worked more-or-less fine with my HD3450. Or even better, maybe it's time to start testing drm-from-git on my hardware.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Tehran
    Posts
    56

    Default

    Yeah... I downloaded, and installed it on My Fedora 11. But guess what!
    aticonfig --initial: No supported adapters detected

    after that my X kept not starting...

    If it helps, I have provided the Xorg log file's important peice of output:

    Code:
    (II) Loading extension DRI2
    (II) LoadModule: "fglrx"
    (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//fglrx_drv.so
    (II) Module fglrx: vendor="FireGL - ATI Technologies Inc."
        compiled for 1.4.99.906, module version = 8.64.3
        Module class: X.Org Video Driver
    (II) Primary Device is: PCI 01@00:00:0
    (WW) Falling back to old probe method for fglrx
    (II) ATI Proprietary Linux Driver Version Identifier:8.64.3
    (II) ATI Proprietary Linux Driver Release Identifier: 8.64                                 
    (II) ATI Proprietary Linux Driver Build Date: Jul 14 2009 21:18:03
    (II) Loading PCS database from /etc/ati/amdpcsdb
    (WW) This ATI Proprietary Linux Driver does not guarantee support of video driver ABI higher than 2.0
    (WW) Video driver ABI version of the X server is 5.0
    (--) Assigning device section with no busID to primary device
    (EE) No devices detected.
    
    Fatal server error:
    no screens found
    
    Please consult the The X.Org Foundation support 
         at http://wiki.x.org
     for help. 
    Please also check the log file at "/var/log/Xorg.0.log" for additional information.
    I tried again with the rpmfusion's catalyst driver, but the result was the same, it gave me the exact error...

  3. #13
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by klaus View Post
    Yeah... I downloaded, and installed it on My Fedora 11. But guess what!
    aticonfig --initial: No supported adapters detected

    after that my X kept not starting...

    If it helps, I have provided the Xorg log file's important peice of output:

    Code:
    (II) Loading extension DRI2
    (II) LoadModule: "fglrx"
    (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//fglrx_drv.so
    (II) Module fglrx: vendor="FireGL - ATI Technologies Inc."
        compiled for 1.4.99.906, module version = 8.64.3
        Module class: X.Org Video Driver
    (II) Primary Device is: PCI 01@00:00:0
    (WW) Falling back to old probe method for fglrx
    (II) ATI Proprietary Linux Driver Version Identifier:8.64.3
    (II) ATI Proprietary Linux Driver Release Identifier: 8.64                                 
    (II) ATI Proprietary Linux Driver Build Date: Jul 14 2009 21:18:03
    (II) Loading PCS database from /etc/ati/amdpcsdb
    (WW) This ATI Proprietary Linux Driver does not guarantee support of video driver ABI higher than 2.0
    (WW) Video driver ABI version of the X server is 5.0
    (--) Assigning device section with no busID to primary device
    (EE) No devices detected.
    
    Fatal server error:
    no screens found
    
    Please consult the The X.Org Foundation support 
         at http://wiki.x.org
     for help. 
    Please also check the log file at "/var/log/Xorg.0.log" for additional information.
    I tried again with the rpmfusion's catalyst driver, but the result was the same, it gave me the exact error...


    I think that log shows that you're using the 9.8 and not the 9.9 driver. Here's from my log:

    Code:
    (II) ATI Proprietary Linux Driver Version Identifier:8.65.4
    (II) ATI Proprietary Linux Driver Release Identifier: 8.65                                 
    (II) ATI Proprietary Linux Driver Build Date: Aug 13 2009 21:15:59

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Tehran
    Posts
    56

    Default

    Well, I tried both, and none resulted. When I installed the 9.9 catalyst, the message told me that errors occured, and I should look at the fglrx_install.log file.

    and here it is:
    Code:
    Unloading radeon module...
    Unloading drm module...
    [Message] Kernel Module : Trying to install a precompiled kernel module.
    [Message] Kernel Module : Precompiled kernel module version mismatched.
    [Message] Kernel Module : Found kernel module build environment, generating kernel module now.
    AMD kernel module generator version 2.1
    doing Makefile based build for kernel 2.6.x and higher
    rm -rf *.c *.h *.o *.ko *.GCC* .??* *.symvers
    make -C /lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.i586/build SUBDIRS=/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x modules
    make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.i586'
      CC [M]  /lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x/firegl_public.o
    In file included from /lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x/firegl_public.c:444:
    /lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x/drm_proc.h: In function ‘FGLDRM__vma_info’:
    /lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x/drm_proc.h:497: warning: format ‘%08lx’ expects type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 5 has type ‘phys_addr_t’
    /lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x/firegl_public.c: In function ‘firegl_init_devices’:
    /lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x/firegl_public.c:926: warning: integer constant is too large for ‘unsigned long’ type
      CC [M]  /lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x/kcl_acpi.o
      CC [M]  /lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x/kcl_agp.o
      CC [M]  /lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x/kcl_debug.o
      CC [M]  /lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x/kcl_ioctl.o
      CC [M]  /lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x/kcl_io.o
      CC [M]  /lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x/kcl_pci.o
      CC [M]  /lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x/kcl_str.o
      CC [M]  /lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x/kcl_wait.o
      LD [M]  /lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x/fglrx.o
      Building modules, stage 2.
      MODPOST 1 modules
      CC      /lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x/fglrx.mod.o
      LD [M]  /lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod/2.6.x/fglrx.ko
    make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/kernels/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.i586'
    build succeeded with return value 0
    duplicating results into driver repository...
    done.
    You must change your working directory to /lib/modules/fglrx
    and then call ./make_install.sh in order to install the built module.
    - recreating module dependency list
    - trying a sample load of the kernel modules
    failed.
    [Error] Kernel Module : Reboot required.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Tehran
    Posts
    56

    Default

    As it said, I restarted the laptop. After booting up, the system crashed, everytime. I blacklisted the radeon and radeonhd modules and this time system came up. But I don't have any kind of acceleration.

    glxinfo says:
    X Error of failed request: BadRequest (invalid request code or no such operation)
    Major opcode of failed request: 135 (GLX)
    Minor opcode of failed request: 19 (X_GLXQueryServerString)
    Serial number of failed request: 16
    Current serial number in output stream: 16

    I can not run aticonfig cause it says:
    aticonfig: No supported adapters detected

    Really, what should I do so that I can use half of my graphic cards power to complete my university project...

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Tehran
    Posts
    56

    Default

    I think i found what was the damn reason behind this error message...
    My Graphic card is X1400, which is not R600+, and ATI has dropped the support for the older cards...

    I AM really sad now. Maybe around 6 or 7 months later a driver from the depths of open source community would come into my aid...

    Maybe I should borrow my friends computer which has a nVidia graphic card...

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,776

    Default

    HD3450 is supported (all HD cards are supported, starting from HD2000.) Something else is going on.

    Edit:
    I'm now officially blind. Somehow I thought you have an HD3450 even though you clearly wrote "X1400".
    Last edited by RealNC; 09-14-2009 at 11:07 AM.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,385

    Default

    Klaus, do you have an X1400 or an HD3450 ?

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,776

    Default

    X1400. For some reason I've read something that wasn't there :P

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    São Paulo, Brazil
    Posts
    73

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RealNC View Post
    X1400. For some reason I've read something that wasn't there :P
    HD3450 is mine. At the top of the page.
    Your clearly not blind, but your mind really need to take a snap.

    For my HD3450 I have now tested fglrx 9.7 up to 9.10beta but get texture corruption with direct3d games over wine with all versions. Don't really know where the problems with the drivers end and the problems with wine start to report the correct bugs.

    Tested with wine 1.1.23 up to 1.1.29. Even the versions that used to work ok together are giving me problems now. I have to completely uninstall fglrx and pull the plug from behind the pc before installing a new version of fglrx otherwise the corruption is way worst.


    @Klaus: really X1400 isn't supported by fglrx anymore. Sad but true. The open-source drivers should work fine with your hardware, but GLSL is not up to par yet, opengl works fine up to v1.5 functionality I think.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •