Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: LGP Brings Over Original Shadowgrounds Game

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,838

    Default LGP Brings Over Original Shadowgrounds Game

    Phoronix: LGP Brings Over Original Shadowgrounds Game

    For the better part of a year, LGP was porting Shadowgrounds: Survivor to Linux after in early 2008 we learned that Shadowgrounds and Shadowgrounds: Survivor were coming to Linux (back when they were being ported outside of LGP). However, in late August, Shadowgrounds: Survivor went gold...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=NzU0Mg

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    983

    Default

    Nice, there's demos out for both games too.

    It doesn't seem to work with Mesa at the moment, not exactly a surprise, but I wonder if LGP is doing any testing on Mesa at all?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Hellas
    Posts
    1,058

    Default

    Good, lets try the demos then.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Dresden
    Posts
    53

    Default

    Well, i tried the demo on debian testing 64bit but:

    http://pastebin.org/18783
    anybody an idea how to fix that?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    233

    Default

    You know, I have heard of developers complaining so much about mesa, because it can only accelerate OpenGL 1.4, making the supported set seem archaic. I think that MESA needs to come up-to-scratch again, and will only do so with Gallium.

    Until MESA is up-to-date enough, it is really a waste of time testing your game designed with shaders, to run on a shaderless stack

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    983

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by grigi View Post
    You know, I have heard of developers complaining so much about mesa, because it can only accelerate OpenGL 1.4, making the supported set seem archaic. I think that MESA needs to come up-to-scratch again, and will only do so with Gallium.

    Until MESA is up-to-date enough, it is really a waste of time testing your game designed with shaders, to run on a shaderless stack
    Mesa supports OpenGL 2.1

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    983

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by .CME. View Post
    Well, i tried the demo on debian testing 64bit but:

    http://pastebin.org/18783
    anybody an idea how to fix that?
    I guess you need ia32-libs-gtk or some other package with ia32 libs.

    Anyway, 32bit support on 64bit is really bad in Debian, you're much better off just running a 32bit system until real multi-arch is implemented.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Dresden
    Posts
    53

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by whizse View Post
    I guess you need ia32-libs-gtk or some other package with ia32 libs.
    [...]
    thanks, that worked

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,458

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by grigi View Post
    You know, I have heard of developers complaining so much about mesa, because it can only accelerate OpenGL 1.4, making the supported set seem archaic. I think that MESA needs to come up-to-scratch again, and will only do so with Gallium.

    Until MESA is up-to-date enough, it is really a waste of time testing your game designed with shaders, to run on a shaderless stack
    The level of GL support with mesa depends on the individual driver. The software renderer supports up to GL 2.1, and the Intel driver is at roughly the same level. The ATI drivers support roughly 1.5 with KMS and 1.4 without KMS. Note that shaders have been supported for a long time via the ARB_Vertex_Program and ARB_Fragment_Program extensions... it's the newer GLSL which is not supported on all drivers yet.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    233

    Default

    I'm running the 2.8 Intel drivers, and I can't get shaders to work at all. This is on an X3100 (G35) CPU. (KMS-enabled) (Mesa 7.5)

    It reports OpenGL 1.4, but most of 1.5 features seem to be supported.

    My point is, the software renderer works quite well, whereas the accelerated options have all kinds of issues. Until mesa can reach the maturity where we can fire up Doom3, and run the standard OpenGL ARB renderer implementation with only very minor errors, most game developers will probably not go through the effort of testing/bugfixing for MESA drivers.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •