Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 52

Thread: Another Look At Intel's Lynnfield Linux Performance

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    210

    Default

    I put together an i7 860 system with a gigabyte p55m-ud4 board and 4x2GB dimms.

    Ran it in parallel with a dual 1.6 clovertown setup with 8GB.

    Programs are multi threaded, scaling linearly. Threads are multiple instances of the same instructions run on data packets.

    Automatch: 860: 7x 1.6x faster
    Least Squares Sparse System: 860: 2.6x faster
    OrthoRectification: 860: 1.6x faster

    Other tests resulted in the 860 system being IO limited.
    I have a dual hapertown 2.33 system I'd also like to run tests against.

    I would hopefully expect a dual core i7 system to really rock.

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    210

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bnolsen View Post
    I put together an i7 860 system with a gigabyte p55m-ud4 board and 4x2GB dimms.

    Ran it in parallel with a dual 1.6 clovertown setup with 8GB.

    Programs are multi threaded, scaling linearly. Threads are multiple instances of the same instructions run on data packets.

    Automatch: 860: 7x 1.6x faster
    Least Squares Sparse System: 860: 2.6x faster
    OrthoRectification: 860: 1.6x faster

    Other tests resulted in the 860 system being IO limited.
    I have a dual hapertown 2.33 system I'd also like to run tests against.

    I would hopefully expect a dual core i7 system to really rock.
    Tests against a dual harpertown 2.33 on a 5400 chipset shows the i860 6-10% faster depending on task. Pretty interesting, it's a hugely worthwhile upgrade from the core2 quad series.

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    6

    Default

    Is there anymore problems with p55? I havent found answer for that question. Does Turbo Mode etc. work well under linux nowdays?

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    210

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Immo View Post
    Is there anymore problems with p55? I havent found answer for that question. Does Turbo Mode etc. work well under linux nowdays?
    Frequency scaling doesn't seem to work. Turbo mode may...the machine is idle and reports 2.93GHz, spec is 2.80. I haven't worked with any core2 quad single socket, I can only compare to dual socket c2d's.

    Monday I'll get my hands on a pair of dual socket i7's and will do some testing on those.

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,683

    Default

    The Turbo mode can be shown only as a +1 mhz increase of default speed with /proc/cpuinfo while 2 other cores use a lower speed state.

  6. #46
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    6

    Default

    Thanks for answers.
    So Turbo doesnt work right then?
    I understood that if single core is under load, it should be 3.2Ghz and if all cores are under load they rise at 2.8Ghz.

    I am thinking of assembling my own computer and these Lynnfields look nice, but if they dont work properly under Linux i'll pass. Should I consider i7 920 or Phenom II instead?

    And sory for my bad English....

  7. #47
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    91

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crat3rs View Post
    One of it's shortcomings, Hyper-Threading Technology is not present, which is needed for working with heavy multi-threaded applications.
    The i7 has hyper-threading, but the i5's don't. I'm no expert but I'd say if you've got 4 cores, that should be enough for most multi-threaded applications.

    Edit: In case anyone is wondering why I replied to a non-existent post, it turns out the post was spam.
    Last edited by ad_267; 12-26-2009 at 04:38 PM.

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    6

    Default

    If you compare AMD's Phenom II 965 and i5 which one wins when looking Linux performance in desktop use?

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    6

    Default

    Is it safe to overclock Lynnfields despite the fact lm_sensors doesn't work?

  10. #50
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    95

    Default

    I wonder when we'll see Michael re-run the tests on his hardware, see if his numbers match up with Intel's ...

    I'm assuming the Intel supplied numbers are absolute best case scenario, you wont do any better without overclocking kind of thing, and you might not be able to match the numbers at stock if you live in a place where ambient temps hang around 32C.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •