Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Trims Number Of Test Releases

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,538

    Default Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Trims Number Of Test Releases

    Phoronix: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Trims Number Of Test Releases

    With the current Ubuntu 9.10 release cycle that we are currently going through, like most earlier releases, there were six alpha releases followed by one beta and a release candidate before going gold. However, with Ubuntu 10.04 -- the next release that will bear Canonical's Long Term Support and is codenamed the Lucid Lynx -- this will not be the case. With the Ubuntu 10.04 LTS release schedule that has just been posted to the Ubuntu Wiki there are just three alpha releases, but two beta releases...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=NzU1OQ

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    7

    Default

    The Ubuntu Wiki link is broken (or no good, technically).

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    15

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Albuquerque NM USA
    Posts
    347

    Default

    After what happened while going through the six alpha releases of Kosmic, this may not be the best idea I've seen today...

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)
    Posts
    628

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rbmorse View Post
    After what happened while going through the six alpha releases of Kosmic, this may not be the best idea I've seen today...
    ++

    they better postpone it then (like said by Marc ?)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Aarhus, Denmark
    Posts
    51

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rbmorse View Post
    After what happened while going through the six alpha releases of Kosmic, this may not be the best idea I've seen today...
    What happened with the Karmic (I guess Kosmic sounds as good/bad!) alphas and why would only three alphas make it worse?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    3

    Default

    Yeah, there were a lot of big changes in Karmic (ext4, grub2, upstart, udev...) which happened in batches and caused some breakages here and there.

    But it makes sense actually to do it this way with 10.04, as it's going to be LTS, so build stability will take priority over features. Plus, it will be kind of build on Karmic as it will be using Gnome2 anyway, so more alphas are not that needed.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    121

    Default

    Looking at that page seems to suggest that packages will be imported from debian testing rather than unstable. There are plenty of packages that stay in unstable a long time being updated frequently. Will Lucid have older packages than karmic?

    This makes great sense for a server or cloud deployment, but not much sense from an end use point of view.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •