Page 1 of 9 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 82

Thread: PulseAudio 0.9.20 Arrives With Fixes

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,083

    Default PulseAudio 0.9.20 Arrives With Fixes

    Phoronix: PulseAudio 0.9.20 Arrives With Fixes

    If you have been running into problems with PulseAudio on your system, an update has been made available this morning that you may want to try. PulseAudio 0.9.20 was released and it carries bug-fixes and translation updates, but not much more...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=NzY5Mg

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    213

    Default

    I've never seen such a buggy thing like pulseaudio on linux regular distros.
    It's fine people is debugging this stuff, but I think they should not release it till it's stable on 99% of configurations.

    BTW a question for who's more informed than me: what's the purpose of PulseAudio? Why ALSA is not enough? Thanks.

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by blackshard View Post
    I've never seen such a buggy thing like pulseaudio on linux regular distros.
    It's fine people is debugging this stuff, but I think they should not release it till it's stable on 99% of configurations.

    BTW a question for who's more informed than me: what's the purpose of PulseAudio? Why ALSA is not enough? Thanks.
    PulseAudio has per-application volume control, some really cool routing stuff (you can seamlessly move a stream from your speakers to a pair of bluetooth headphones, or to another computer, for example), can stream audio over a network, and more...

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by srg_13 View Post
    PulseAudio has per-application volume control, some really cool routing stuff (you can seamlessly move a stream from your speakers to a pair of bluetooth headphones, or to another computer, for example), can stream audio over a network, and more...
    Seamlessy, of course, not counting all of the pops, clicks, and skipping that PA always causes on most systems.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    127.0.0.1
    Posts
    89

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by srg_13 View Post
    PulseAudio has per-application volume control, some really cool routing stuff (you can seamlessly move a stream from your speakers to a pair of bluetooth headphones, or to another computer, for example), can stream audio over a network, and more...
    But, you can't do really simple stuff like using S/PDIF to connect your HTPC to digital receiver.
    Actually you can, but try following scenario:
    Open Firefox, watch some video (Youtube), read some news after.
    Open VLC and play AC-3/DTS movie.
    close VLC, go back to FF and try another video ...
    ooops, no sound until FF restarted in best case scenario.
    Some times it's simpler to reboot computer than to find the stacked program.
    Last time i checked, there was no plans to add AC-3/DTS passthrough.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    86

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thefirstm View Post
    Seamlessy, of course, not counting all of the pops, clicks, and skipping that PA always causes on most systems.
    As opposed to ALSA dropping audio every time I change the volume? Or how about the old days of using ALSA directly, where one program would hoard hw:0 and prevent anything else from using audio?

    Pulseaudio ain't perfect, but neither is any other part of the Linux sound stack...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chaos386 View Post
    Pulseaudio ain't perfect, but neither is any other part of the Linux sound stack...
    True, but pulseaudio is the worst. Both alsa and oss4 are much better, I would personally go for oss due the higher quality (at least to my ears) drivers.

    OSS4 should go into the kernel, that should put all this linux audio nonsense to rest.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Under the bridge
    Posts
    2,146

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by niick View Post
    True, but pulseaudio is the worst. Both alsa and oss4 are much better, I would personally go for oss due the higher quality (at least to my ears) drivers.

    OSS4 should go into the kernel, that should put all this linux audio nonsense to rest.
    Err, how about no? Get over it, PulseAudio is the future (and it really is much better than OSS4, plain ALSA or ALSA/ESD).

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    213

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackStar View Post
    Err, how about no? Get over it, PulseAudio is the future (and it really is much better than OSS4, plain ALSA or ALSA/ESD).
    Well, to hear some music I had to stop PulseAudio deleting it's executable...

    I always had many problems on many different machines with PulseAudio. It is not mature at all and should not be used in stable distributions IMHO.

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by niick View Post
    True, but pulseaudio is the worst. Both alsa and oss4 are much better, I would personally go for oss due the higher quality (at least to my ears) drivers.

    OSS4 should go into the kernel, that should put all this linux audio nonsense to rest.
    There are many problems with OSS4 (maybe more then with any other thing), so thanks, but no.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •