Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 27

Thread: Unigine Heaven For Linux Status Update

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,645

    Default Unigine Heaven For Linux Status Update

    Phoronix: Unigine Heaven For Linux Status Update

    Our Russian friends at Unigine Corp, who have their very impressive Unigine Engine that is multi-platform and delivers the best graphics on Linux and have said they like Linux very much, last month released Unigine Heaven. Heaven is the most-impressive tech demo / benchmark yet, but when released in October it only came out for Windows with its DirectX 11 renderer...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=NzY5NA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    565

    Default

    In other words there's no reason not to release it now, since most users won't see the tessellation any way. I also don't get the part about waiting on AMD. If it doesn't run with particular drivers, just blame the drivers if they're at fault. Holding a demo back because of one particular driver seems a bit silly but whatever.
    Last edited by Yfrwlf; 11-12-2009 at 10:35 AM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Rijeka, Croatia
    Posts
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yfrwlf View Post
    In other words there's no reason not to release it now, since most users won't see the tessellation any way. I also don't get the part about waiting on AMD. If it doesn't run with particular drivers, just blame the drivers if they're at fault. Holding a demo back because of one particular driver seems a bit silly but whatever.
    The problem being, that is the driver for only hardware that supports tessellation. They could as well be waiting for nvidia's hardware to show up.

    I really don't see the problem in releasing the demo without tessellation, and adding it later when the support comes.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    269

    Default

    Besides that, for the tessellation functionality you will need DirectX 11 grade hardware (such as AMD's Radeon HD 5000 "Evergreen" series GPUs, like the Radeon HD 5750 and Radeon HD 5770) or NVIDIA's GeForce GT 300 "Fermi" series once released. This hardware isn't exactly widespread at the moment, so most Linux users already will be limited to running the non-tessellated version of Unigine Heaven.
    since when is DirectX running under linux

    or, more specific: why do we (linuxusers) need a DirectX11 graphicchip for OpenGL?
    Last edited by Detructor; 11-12-2009 at 10:49 AM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,572

    Default

    Because you want to use some of the features defined by DX11 on Linux via OpenGL extensions.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    416

    Default

    Will this run on OpenGL 1.5? I'd like to try this on my 4850 using the mesa driver.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    20

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bridgman View Post
    Because you want to use some of the features defined by DX11 on Linux via OpenGL extensions.
    wasn't the tassellation unit present also in DX10.1 parts?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,572

    Default

    Yes, but it's a different design, without the hull and domain shaders AFAIK.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    269

    Default

    ah okay...so I've to buy a new graphiccard.

    whoa...that is the very first time that I buy a new graphiccard because of game and not just because I'm buying a whole new PC, because my old one is either not working anymore or it is given away to parents.

    cool o_0

    however, ATI will gain some money through that game/demo/engine

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    40

    Default

    So it seems AMD has the lead this time?
    Fermi is somewhere in 2010 and with Catalyst 10.1 we have DirectX11-feature on Linux long before Nvidia can deliver something equal.

    Congratulations AMD

    Now kick TSMC and make them bake some chips, so you hopefully don't miss christmas (as happened with the 3870). And then bring the stock to 100$ per share

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •