Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Thread: Chromium OS, Moblin, Ubuntu Netbook Remix Benchmarks

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,649

    Default Chromium OS, Moblin, Ubuntu Netbook Remix Benchmarks

    Phoronix: Chromium OS, Moblin, Ubuntu Netbook Remix Benchmarks

    Intel released Moblin 2.1 earlier this month, Canonical released Ubuntu Netbook Remix 9.10 late last month, and various other vendors have offered up their fall distribution refreshes too. Oh yeah, and Google just released the Chromium OS source code a few days ago! With all of the netbook-focused distribution updates, we found it time to run an onslaught of new benchmarks, comparing some of the leaders in this field along with running a couple full-blown desktop distributions for this round of Linux netbook benchmarking. Here are our benchmarks, including the world's first look at the Chromium OS (Chrome OS) system performance from the latest development build. Covered is everything from the video playback performance to encoding to battery power consumption and CPU/memory usage tests.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=14393

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,175

    Default

    Didn't they say they wanted to replace some parts of the Xorg stack?

    Also I can't see them basing Chrome OS on Ubuntu in the future...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,002

    Default

    I downloaded a VMware image of Chromium OS a couple of days ago, and ran it in VirtualBox. It boots very fast but the Chrome browser was the only app I could use, so I don't know how exactly you got to remount the root file-system. I got bored pretty quickly by it.
    Last edited by monraaf; 11-23-2009 at 02:33 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    579

    Default

    lol fedora's screenshot with gnome looks so bad compared to the opensuse kde4 one.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Merida
    Posts
    1,114

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bulletxt View Post
    lol fedora's screenshot with gnome looks so bad compared to the opensuse kde4 one.

    Fedora's GNOME got to be the worst (looking) out there. I cringe every time I see a default GNOME Fedora desktop.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    24

    Default disappointing comparison....

    *** DISCLAIMER: I work for Intel, on Moblin. ***

    I find it hard to believe that this review largely focussed on generic linux desktop performance while the test subjects where all _netbook_ specific OS spins, tested on a typical netbook platform.

    For the next time, take a look at the following instead:

    - boot times
    - suspend/resume times
    - total battery life while idle
    - battery life while performing netbook-typical tasks, such as:
    + browsing webpages inclusing flash
    + perhaps watching youtube/hulu videos
    + skypeing etc

    encoding x264 is totally irrelevant on any netbook install, and the differences on the 7z encoding could as well have been omitted from the review leaving little meat. The only big difference I can see is due to ext3/4 differences (and then moblin is going to use btrfs in the future as well...)

    all in all, this review IMHO lacks quite some substance... something that won't help the targeted netbook audience nor me as a developer.

    sure, phoronix is read by geeks (guilty here), but taking openarena fps as a significant test is dubious on any netbook platform unless you measure power consumption at the same time (and then the result may be skewed by the OS sacrificing FPS for power).

    I know phoronix can do a lot better!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    158

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by monraaf View Post
    I downloaded a VMware image of Chromium OS a couple of days ago, and ran it in VirtualBox. It boots very fast but the Chrome browser was the only app I could use, so I don't know how exactly you got to remount the root file-system. I got bored pretty quickly by it.
    The videos about Chromium OS say they want to avoid the double initialization of hardware (the BIOS does it, then the kernel does all over again).

    That's probably going to require something like coreboot. (Or maybe EFI... I don't know anything about EFI - maybe it can skip some of the stuff BIOS does?)

    So even though the vmware image you tried boots fast, it probably still doesn't do justice to the boot speed that should result from what they're planning.
    Last edited by StringCheesian; 11-23-2009 at 07:50 PM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,675

    Default

    @sofar

    Tell me who is to blame for the extremely bad moblin performance with vbox? And why is the generated filesystem so extremely small, thats without any reason as it only restricts the size to install extra software - it is not enough for vbox addons. With fedora it does work using:

    http://kanotix.com/files/install-vbox-addons.sh

    So why not in Moblin which is definitely a fedora clone. I know there are some extra depends needed to install, but without more space to install it is not that easy.
    Last edited by Kano; 11-23-2009 at 07:54 PM.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    1

    Default CPU usage allright with openSuse

    I don't think it is too surprising that suse utilizes its cpu most. The target with battery and cpu-usage is - (sometimes) - to use the cpu as much as possible but less than 100%. So if you slow it down, the percentage will be higher, and you save energy while at it.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    24

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kano View Post
    @sofar

    Tell me who is to blame for the extremely bad moblin performance with vbox?
    long (technical) answer:

    moblin is developed for netbooks, not for enthusiasts who want to run it inside a VM. Developing a netbook OS and making it run well in a VM as well is virtually impossible, since only virtualbox currently has OpenGL passthru, but it is completely dependent on the compatibility between the hosts' OpenGL capabilities, vbox's mapping to, and the client's requirements from the 3D hardware. Since moblin's UI requires hardware accelerated OpenGL (you can't make a decent UI nowadays without 3D and composite support...), it's pretty unlikely that you'll get anywhere near the native performance under any VM implementation, and vbox's OpenGL passthru isn't mature enough (or can't ever be...) to fix that hole.

    People keep assuming that they can just test-drive every OS inside a VM and get 100% of the look/feel/performance of how it works on a real device, but in Moblin's case that is a totally wrong perception.


    And why is the generated filesystem so extremely small, thats without any reason as it only restricts the size to install extra software
    I'm not sure what you are referring to here, care to file a bugreport with numbers and debug output on bugzilla.moblin.org?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •