Page 1 of 24 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 231

Thread: Ubuntu is NOT a part of community

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    122

    Default Ubuntu is NOT a part of community

    Yesterday, I saw interesting video of Greg Kroah-Hartman Linux Plumbers Keynote:

    Greg Kroah-Hartman Linux Plumbers Keynote

    It reassured me about my point of view of Ubuntu/Canonical. No matter what you think about ubuntu, the video is worth watching. The raw numbers are clear but I found most interesting moment Greg draws schemes on a board with people interacting upstream and downstream.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Albuquerque NM USA
    Posts
    349

    Default

    This is really old news.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,133

    Default

    There are improving. Maybe not with Linux, but with other desktop relevant fields (Gnome/KDE applications etc.).

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    997

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by d2kx View Post
    There are improving. Maybe not with Linux, but with other desktop relevant fields (Gnome/KDE applications etc.).
    Good one.

    For every component of Linux, Ubuntu was at the bottom of the list.

    What I don't get is why this SITE promotes the heck out of Ubuntu when they contribute SO little to Linux and Open Source? Every test of hardware, it's Ubuntu. Drivers comparison? Ubuntu. Makes no sense to me. Ubuntu is the most popular mainstream Linux OS, so what? Use Fedora or Debian from time to time for tests. Or sidux or Mepis since they are more mainstream-oriented for debian-based distros. Or how about Mandriva which is quite noob friendly. At least, they contribute.

    Also, is there a worse combo of Ubuntu and ATI?!?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Merida
    Posts
    1,100

    Default

    A lot of distros work the same way, no just Ubuntu. It's just that since Ubuntu has grown so much people are starting to look at the problem more closely.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,631

    Default

    Ubuntu is very popular and compared to that the efforts they have to do on their own is lower than Red Hat and SuSE. If you create a distribution it is in most cases compared to U, so you have to be better in some areas otherwise somebody could just use U. ATI seems to love U in a way that they are the only ones that receive public beta drivers in time for a new release. Maybe because they focus on enterprise distributions and think that Fedora (which is usally the first major distro with new xserver) is only used by OSS supporters who dislike binary drivers anyway.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    122

    Default

    One of the controversial thing is, Ubuntu is traditionally and loudly mark themselves as the most communitiest community. Whitch is completelly bullshit. They have nothing to do with community. Even Debian, witch they clone, is not satisfied with the feedback.

    Only taking and not giving back, this is not community.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Merida
    Posts
    1,100

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by next9 View Post
    One of the controversial thing is, Ubuntu is traditionally and loudly mark themselves as the most communitiest community. Whitch is completelly bullshit. They have nothing to do with community. Even Debian, witch they clone, is not satisfied with the feedback.

    Only taking and not giving back, this is not community.

    They are just playing with words. When they say "community" they usually mean their own community, as in their pool of users and own developers. In this aspect they are rather good and it rivals others like Fedora and such.
    But yeah, it sucks. I remember having a problem with new kernels and some motherboards with a certain chip. Ended up being a regression in the kernel but it took months for someone to even catch it. Got nowhere with Ubuntu and had to go to the kernel devs. directly. They acknowledged it, and provided a fix in a few weeks (compared to a dead end after several months dealing with Ubuntu devs.), and was even incorporated into later kernels.
    If you're a "user" and all you care about is having a working desktop to work on, the distros like Ubuntu aren't that bad; your problems are usually simple and can be easily resolved within their own "community". But if you're a developer of some kind, are interested in interacting with the Linux community, run a business of sorts that relies on high maintenance computer systems, then best look someplace else.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    34

    Default What is the ultimate Goal?

    There are many excellent distributions of Linux available.

    IMO we should be focusing on making Linux more popular with the general public (i.e reducing Microsoft's market share from 90+ %)

    Ubuntu has taken a approach that seems to have some success.

    We should be taking positive steps to replicate this success

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Merida
    Posts
    1,100

    Default

    Ubuntu is great and all, but ultimately Linux depends on community interaction. Ubuntu breaks this rule (as do many other smaller distros). Follow their model if you will, but don't forget about the basic necessities of Linux.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •