Gnome , for political reasons, to the detriment of KDE/XFCE/[insert marginal DE]
KDE, for political reasons, to the detriment of Gnome/XFCE/[insert marginal DE]
XFCE, for political reasons, to the detriment of Gnome/KDE/[insert marginal DE]
[Insert marginal DE], for inconsequent reasons, to the detriment of Gnome/KDE/XFCE
Not only that, but I also have the facts to prove it
Personally, I believe in Gnome
Personally, I believe in KDE
Personally, I believe in Steve Jobs
Personally, I am a Microsoft apologist
Personally, I believe you are a troll and that this thread is rubbish
I certainly fully expect that when you've been dealt with for your various actions, you will indeed find it difficult to get gainful employment, certainly in any field relating to computers and/or the internet. I also expect that you'll be paying me punitive damages out of whatever earnings you can drum up from a job at McDonald's or via begging on the street as a consequence of your irresponsible claims regarding my supposed drug addiction, publication of pornography, pedophilia and (heh) cannibalism. You've publicly accused me of multiple crimes, and you haven't got a shred of evidence to show for yourself.
Now, if the consequences look to you like they "threaten your survivability", then maybe you should have thought twice or more times before you undertook the actions you did. You can't do those sorts of things and then complain that your victims are taking issue with you.
That will, however, be your own fault, and a consequence of the actions you undertook. You;ll get every chance to defend yourself, but I don't think things look too good for you, honestly.
Or did you somehow forget about that?
The difference is that I'm talking about presenting my position in court; you're, instead, engaging in illegal stalking and harassment.
If you need an affidavit, a sworn statement, or some other document attesting to what transpired between myself and Mr. Schlesinger, I will be more than happy to provide one."
Mr. Cypert's affidavit, should it actually make an appearance, won't prove to be useful for anything more than bird-cage lining, as I've said. His manager and the union's HR department, will back up my story, not the version you're attempting to spin here.
In speaking with his manager at the time regarding Mr. Cypert's use of a workplace machine to issue threats of bodily harm—I've never spoke directly to Mr. Cypert—he told me that, other than this incident, Mr. Cypert wasn't a horrible employee, and he asked me whether I would consider letting him keep his job, although he was indeed prepared to fire him if I insisted.
I agreed on the condition that there was absolutely no repetition of anything of the sort, and that neither I, nor anyone related to me, was to hear so much as a squeak out of him in the future. His manager readily agreed.
As I've noted, it seems that things between Mr. Cypert and the union couldn't have come to a terribly positive end, since the position in question doesn't even appear on his resume.
But hey, if he's willing to have all of that dragged out in court in the baffling belief that this will somehow either help you or hurt me, I'm game. Trot out your affidavit, by all means. Where are we trying this case, anyway?
I've still not heard a single word from the Santa Cruz County Sheriff nor the FBI. Any idea what the delay is? Maybe they tried to verify your contact information and discovered it was bogus...?
Mr. Cypert is on record as vehemently denying he ever sent you any kind of threat or menace.