Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Linus Wants Nouveau Merged Into Kernel

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,224

    Default Linus Wants Nouveau Merged Into Kernel

    Phoronix: Linus Wants Nouveau Merged Into Kernel

    This morning the first DRM pull request went in for the Linux 2.6.33 kernel that brings many nice graphics changes for Intel, ATI/AMD, and VMware users. Anything for NVIDIA hardware through Novueau was not mentioned as there is no readied support, but as we stated in our article this morning, its unlikely to see Nouveau's DRM in the mainline kernel before the Linux 2.6.34 kernel...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=Nzc5MA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,607

    Default

    The idea is really good, it shouldn't be that bad when Fedora ships it by default. But then go further and do the same for aufs2 please - Ubuntu ships it too by default.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kano View Post
    The idea is really good, it shouldn't be that bad when Fedora ships it by default. But then go further and do the same for aufs2 please - Ubuntu ships it too by default.
    aufs will probably never be merged, the vfs maintainers are looking for other solutions, like union mounts instead.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,607

    Default

    Well the current solutions like Fedora/Moblin uses without aufs2 is not that good. It restricts the usable space too much - not just the size of the tmpfs used for aufs which could be increased easlyly with a remount,size=xG.

  5. #5

    Default

    The mailing list client at sourceforge really sucks. I didn't manage to view the entire thread :/
    Anyway, for Nouveau, it seems that their are issues with some microde that need to be solved too.

  6. #6

    Default

    "David Airlie nor any of the Nouveau developers have yet to comment on this thread, but we are awaiting their response(s). "

    Note that it's currently the middle of the night in Australia, where Red Hat's nouveau developer (Ben Skeggs) lives. (Also where Dave lives, for that matter).

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AdamW View Post
    "David Airlie nor any of the Nouveau developers have yet to comment on this thread, but we are awaiting their response(s). "

    Note that it's currently the middle of the night in Australia, where Red Hat's nouveau developer (Ben Skeggs) lives. (Also where Dave lives, for that matter).
    Yep, I know their locations, I am just commenting though that they haven't said an official response yet.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Die trolls, die!
    Posts
    525

    Default

    there are a few interesting responses:
    http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/f...ewmonth=200912

    (also unfortunatley unable to show the thread)

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kano View Post
    Well the current solutions like Fedora/Moblin uses without aufs2 is not that good. It restricts the usable space too much - not just the size of the tmpfs used for aufs which could be increased easlyly with a remount,size=xG.
    that may be the case, but that doesn't help get aufs merged when the vfs maintainers are against it so completely.
    You should look into union mounts status.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    54

    Default

    I've heard all the excuses. If it isn't ready, they shouldn't ship it to millions of people.
    Geeeeee whillickers, Mr Torvalds! What part of "perpetual beta-ness of Fedora" don't you understand?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •