Will Compiz 0.9 Be Released By Next Week?
Phoronix: Will Compiz 0.9 Be Released By Next Week?
It's been a while since last talking about the Compiz project as they simply haven't had any new releases or major developments in a while. Early this year the developers did announce that Nomad and Compiz++ would merge into Compiz and that Compiz Fusion would be dropped and other changes planned...
compiz is C++ only??
And me getting rid of the C++ bits on my system (the only remaining bits are CSS renderer and PDF renderer)... will need a new super eye candy window manager coded in C.
Phoronix - where no news is still news :-D
I feel these posts are good because it shows that Phoronix is doing book keeping. They want to be the first to get the information out there so they are keeping track of when things are supposed to happen so when the time comes they can seek out evidence on what _is_ happening.
Originally Posted by FireBurn
And by posting what they find, I don't have to go find it myself. That is, if I was really looking forward to the 0.9 release I don't need to look through the git for branching that might indicate future plans.
Are you making fun of the anti-Mono crowd, or are you serious?
Originally Posted by sylware
Dennis and I had planned to have 0.9.0 out by xmas eve but development has slowed a bit and I have been setting up a new server (plus I got myself a job, again ...)
I must ask- why are you so dead-set against C++?
Originally Posted by sylware
I like these updates.
I believe in naming names and credit and blame where they are due.
I believe in accountability, even in FOSS.
An interesting (though very research intensive) article would
compare many open source projects and how well they meet their
The answer would be none of them [TM], except maybe Ubuntu and GNOME.
Originally Posted by linuxjacques
Most project have difficulty meeting their deadlines due to their voluntary work nature and the nature of developing software.
Software is a bit like 'OK if everything goes to plan, this should work' but no matter how much careful designing you did, there will always be one really really really annoying bug and obscure bug that will come up before release, usually as the result of a typo or something similar. (Think > instead of < in an if statement, which can lead to hard lockups due to infinite while loops).
Commercial organizations will either push the release back if there are a lot of showstopping bugs or they'll ask programmers to do what they can which usually results in a bunch of really nasty hacks before release.
Couple the nature of software development in general with the fact that a lot of developers do development because it is voluntary and they are in the mood usually leads to pushed back release dates. It's why giving an ETA for such things is never a good idea since it puts unnecessary pressure on you to get it done in a rush.
I always think you have to be in the mood to get some software hacking done. You're either feeling up to it or your aren't. It's weird. When you don't treat it like a chore, you'll get loads done in an instant, then move on to something else and come back to it later and get loads more done. If you treat it like a chore, nothing actually gets done.
Because C++ sucks and I wish it would die. It's too bloated and slow compared to C, C-- and assembly. (Sorry, couldn't resist )
On topic now, does anyone care to predict how Compiz will fit in once Gnome 3 is out? With KDE and Gnome having their own compositors enabled by default, Compiz would be left in a pretty tight spot (personally, I don't think I'd bother installing it at all).
Also, is there any progress on vsync support? I think x developers were working on a new protocol to allow compositors to sync to the refresh rate - does anyone know what's the status of that and whether it will be adopted by Compiz?