Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 26

Thread: VIA Releases New Documentation, But It's Old

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,557

    Default VIA Releases New Documentation, But It's Old

    Phoronix: VIA Releases New Documentation, But It's Old

    A few weeks back we shared VIA's Linux TODO list, which was very disappointing to say the least. VIA Technologies has gone through several phases of trying to be "open-source friendly" and they certainly try to brand themselves as such, but it's still going to be a year (or longer) before they have a viable open-source driver stack and by that time the VIA hardware that's supported will be dated...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=Nzg3NA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    331

    Default

    Still, at least they're trying. Unlike other we're-too-good-for-OSS companies.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Madison, WI, USA
    Posts
    864

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ant P. View Post
    Still, at least they're trying. Unlike other we're-too-good-for-OSS companies.
    Agreed. At least they're releasing documentation for something that's still on the market.

    Given that their current products are based on the VX800, it's somewhat possible the next generation will also be a similar derivative. If so, any documentation we get now might help us prepare proper drivers for the future as well. If we can get the current hardware to be well supported, it might be less work to get the next-gen stuff working.

    And really, better late (VIA) than never (NVidia) I guess...

  4. #4

    Default

    Except Nvidia's chips actually do something useful....

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ant P. View Post
    Still, at least they're trying. Unlike other we're-too-good-for-OSS companies.

    nvidia? "too-good-for-OSS" = "The Way It's Meant To Be Played"

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    573

    Default

    I think nvidia should release all specs from Geforce2 to Geforce 6 series. There are 0 reasons to not do this.

    About VIA, good job but continue to release new specs.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    in front of my box :p
    Posts
    781

    Default

    Argh. Well. Something at least, yes. But what about the old chips like CLE266 and CN700? They should be capable of doing more but there is nothing by driver to get them going. They refuse EXA, they will blacken the screen if you try any opengl game... so what will be done about that matter?
    Didn't really see something for these still not really working chips.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Old Europe
    Posts
    910

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bulletxt View Post
    I think nvidia should release all specs from Geforce2 to Geforce 6 series. There are 0 reasons to not do this.
    Well, there are some reasons not to do this even IF the are willing to push out docs.

    It has been said many times on this forum: It's a very demanding process (manpower)
    to get these documents ready if they aren't already in "good shape" - and it's doubtful that they are if they were only meant for internal use.

    That's why I can't appreciate enough the work done by AMD/Bridgman
    concerning documentation for such complex pieces of hardware.

    I'll take the chance to thank you again!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,341

    Default

    The date on the docs really has no bearing on anything. The docs were likely written before the hardware even hit final silicon. Cleaning up and reviewing the docs and sending them through legal can be a long process. Who are you to say how long this process should take? Preparing documentation for public release is a lot of work (I know, I've done it for a lot of AMD stuff). Lots of the internal docs I draw on when I prepare the open documentation were written months (or even years in some cases) prior to when the relevant hardware was actually released (hardware design for GPUs starts years in advance). Once you have that info, you need to cross check it with what features/quirks actually made it to silicon. Add in a few rounds of revisions and engineering and legal sign off and it can easily take months.
    Last edited by agd5f; 01-12-2010 at 03:08 PM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,414

    Default

    ... and for the record, agd5f has done more work in this area than anyone I know, including myself...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •