Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: GIMP 2.8 Scheduled For Release Post-Christmas

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    13,394

    Default GIMP 2.8 Scheduled For Release Post-Christmas

    Phoronix: GIMP 2.8 Scheduled For Release Post-Christmas

    For those interested in the next major update to the GIMP graphics editing application (GIMP 2.8), it now has a tentative release date. GIMP's Martin Nordholts has announced on his blog that GIMP 2.8 is scheduled for release on the 27th of December of this year...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=NzkxNw

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    141

    Default

    That is one ridiculously long release cycle. Either they are doing a major overhaul, need to switch to a shorter cycle, or are seriously lacking manpower.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    52

    Default

    I'd say they are lacking funds. Gimp could use some funding from larger more well known companies as I can't seem to recognise any of the companies listed on their donor page.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,532

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SkyHiRider View Post
    I'd say they are lacking funds. Gimp could use some funding from larger more well known companies as I can't seem to recognise any of the companies listed on their donor page.
    Well the delay could also stem from the fact of them wanting to change licenses either having to contact contributed code or rewrite that code from scratch.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,279

    Default

    Sounds like they are making some pretty big changes. A year doesn't seem out of line for a *major* release, does it ?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    416

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bridgman View Post
    Sounds like they are making some pretty big changes. A year doesn't seem out of line for a *major* release, does it ?
    2.7.0 came out in August, and I have no idea how long they had been working on it before that.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    The intarwebs
    Posts
    385

    Default

    Uh. GIMP's biggest single problem right now is that it's name is a bondage reference. Second is probably single window mode. Third I'd pin on GEGL migration.

    If I were them I'd set about fixing the first two and getting a new release out IMMEDIATELY. As it stands, they'll just have everybody and their mom using alphas and snapshots and complaining about how it isn't stable... for like a year.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bridgman View Post
    Sounds like they are making some pretty big changes. A year doesn't seem out of line for a *major* release, does it ?
    Is this a real question, a rethorical question or are you trying to go somewhere with this? :P

    ps: i totaly forgot to get back to you on the copyright law discussion so I'll just grant you the victory on that matter ^^, although I'll keep doing what I'm doing... </offtopic>

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,279

    Default

    Somewhere in between, I guess. Most people seem to greatly underestimate how long it takes to make major changes to a software product, whether it be a driver or an application.

    The most common pattern I see in the open source world goes something like :

    - how come nothing is happening ?
    - how come nothing is happening ?
    - how come nothing is happening ?
    - how come nothing is happening ?
    - how come nothing is happening ? These guys suck !!
    - how come nothing is happening ? Someone needs to replace <product>
    - ok, finally something is happening but I expected more
    - wow look how fast things are changing - see I knew it was easy
    - how come nothing is happening ?
    - how come nothing is happening ?
    - how come nothing is happening ?
    ...

    What is really happening, of course, is that all the hard work is being done behind the scenes, and when the foundation work is ready for use it shows up and the benefits from a year of hard work appear bit by bit, but relatively quickly.

    Big changes to complex software take a long time. Sometimes the passage of time is hidden (ie the foundation work is done quietly or in a private repo) and sometimes the passage of time is visible (as is the case here) but if you look at pretty much any major software revision there's usually a year or two between starting work and having a solid finished product.

    Incremental changes can easily appear in incremental releases, but major internal changes normally don't lend themselves to frequent releases.
    Last edited by bridgman; 01-24-2010 at 01:56 PM.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    872

    Default

    What about 16bit/channel support? Will it be implemented in 2.8?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •