You KDE fanbois have you actually used this pile of trash called KDE? Or you are judging it based on screenshots?
I have been using it on Arch for 2 months 4.3.2-4.3.4 and it still has so many bugs it is not funny. I could not even reliebly copy a bunch of files without fear of some missing their target. Dolphin sucked with some major bugs(international encoding for example created zombie files) and i experienced overall instability.
And all these for what? An overall look inspired(in other words copied) from windows vista/7? Some plasma widgets no one is using? A mediocre at best windows style?
I switched to GNOME(again...) and i do not intend to go back to KDE soon. Maybe testing it(4.4) in a VM and that's about it. GNOME is far more reliable and stable at the moment, and for the eye candy factor you could always use a better gtk engine/compiz/cairo-dock and create a modern looking gui. I find it more usable too, and GNOME 3.0 looks really exciting.
Stop saying GNOME sucks just to prove it to yourselves. Most people still use GNOME...
Last edited by TemplarGR; 01-26-2010 at 12:36 AM.
Go get 'em, tiger.
Last edited by kraftman; 01-26-2010 at 04:00 AM.
Find which statement doesn't fit.I found it unusable. XFCE is far better in my opinion. Most people use KDE.
Well saidOriginally Posted by some-guy
Yeeeeeees! We needed fresh blood for this kind of threads. The old guard was growing tired of each others' faces and they almost had a tacit non-aggression pact. I hope things change with you on board, you sound really promising!Originally Posted by TemplarGR