Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: NVIDIA Publishes 195.xx Linux Driver Beta

  1. #11
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,584

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by droidhacker View Post
    No, I am quite serious.
    Well if nvidia blobs are dysfunctional, feature and performance wise you would have to call FOSS drivers non-functional.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    278

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deanjo View Post
    Silly you, I think you've posted to the wrong forums again. Here let me help you,

    http://www.phoronix.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=19

    You want him to post this in al those threads?

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    .ca
    Posts
    403

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by talvik View Post
    And this is the first time I'm satisfied with kwin effects performance.
    Do you have any idea how many years of bitching on the nvnews forums it took us to get them do something about KDE4?? And I'm pretty sure it still doesn't work properly on GF8xxx hardware. I wouldn't even be surprised if nouveau is already better at that.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    92

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by not.sure View Post
    Do you have any idea how many years of bitching on the nvnews forums it took us to get them do something about KDE4?? And I'm pretty sure it still doesn't work properly on GF8xxx hardware. I wouldn't even be surprised if nouveau is already better at that.
    The problem was that software fallbacks are very expensive on G80+ hardware. Now almost all of XRENDER is accelerated in hardware.

    Or in short ... you are wrong

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Connecticut,USA
    Posts
    962

    Default

    the latest 195.36.03 beta build works great for me on my trusty old XFX 7900GS card. If nVidia is serious about fixing issues its then a good thing people DO bitch about the problems loud enough for the devs to hear.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,584

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DeepDayze View Post
    If nVidia is serious about fixing issues its then a good thing people DO bitch about the problems loud enough for the devs to hear.
    You know that's the sad part, you do not have to bitch loud, you just have to give them reproducible and detailed bug reports. Over the years I have reported many of them and you'd be surprised how fast a "non-ranting" detailed bug report will get you results in quick fashion.

    A detailed reproducible bug sent to linux-bugs@nvidia.com will yield you better results then any rant posting.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Connecticut,USA
    Posts
    962

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deanjo View Post
    You know that's the sad part, you do not have to bitch loud, you just have to give them reproducible and detailed bug reports. Over the years I have reported many of them and you'd be surprised how fast a "non-ranting" detailed bug report will get you results in quick fashion.

    A detailed reproducible bug sent to linux-bugs@nvidia.com will yield you better results then any rant posting.
    Yes, that makes sense...so people who do experience problems should be sending in those bug reports. Bet the nvidia devs get a torrent of bugreports

  8. #18
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,584

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DeepDayze View Post
    Yes, that makes sense...so people who do experience problems should be sending in those bug reports. Bet the nvidia devs get a torrent of bugreports
    Sure they do, submitting a bug is one thing, the important thing is to be as detailed as you can be. Too many people consider something like "My xyz card doesn't do zyx, please fix this" and then turn all pissy when it's not resolved, not because the developer didn't care it's because it contained no useful information. It really irks a devel even more when you give precise instructions on how to create a useful bug report and people completely ignore it. I would venture to guess that less then 10% of bug reports are useful. Of that 10% a large percentage of that is just plain user error. Takes a while to sift the chaff from the wheat when that happens.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    15

    Default

    Hello folks.

    There are three .run files on NVIDIA's ftp site (for X86_64). Not sure which one to download ?

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    158

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by a7ilcy View Post
    Hello folks.

    There are three .run files on NVIDIA's ftp site (for X86_64). Not sure which one to download ?
    They only differ is how many precompiled kernel modules they include (for different kernels, otherwise the installer needs you to have gcc and kernel headers so it can compile one) and maybe whether they include 32 bit compatibility stuff.

    The one with the highest number at the end should be the safest choice, see the readme:
    ftp://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Li...ectdriver.html

    Your distro might provide a better way to install it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •