Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 69

Thread: AMD Catalyst 10.2 For Linux Gets Direct2D

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    14,378

    Default AMD Catalyst 10.2 For Linux Gets Direct2D

    Phoronix: AMD Catalyst 10.2 For Linux Gets Direct2D

    This morning we reported on AMD revealing forthcoming Catalyst driver changes, particularly a set of new features that applied to Windows users. However, we hinted that there might be some changes coming to the Linux driver and now Catalyst 10.2 for Linux is out there so we have the first confirmation of what may be to come. The release notes for the Catalyst 10.2 Linux release are not yet available nor is the AMD web-site updated, but savvy readers have located the 10.2 download link...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=Nzk5MQ

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,117

    Default

    I haven't tried the driver as I am running... another version, but Michael, are you really sure you haven't mixed up something? Because, without going into much detail, for a certain group of people, the experimental Direct2D acceleration was only avaible with a Catalyst release newer than the 10.2.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Canton, China
    Posts
    25

    Default

    Direct2D...

    It is too hard to understand why AMD do it.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    984

    Default

    I'd rather have Direct3D in their Linux driver. Surely they cannot make it worse than their buggy OpenGL implementation.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Merida
    Posts
    1,099

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by d2kx View Post
    I haven't tried the driver as I am running... another version, but Michael, are you really sure you haven't mixed up something? Because, without going into much detail, for a certain group of people, the experimental Direct2D acceleration was only avaible with a Catalyst release newer than the 10.2.

    Yeah, 10.2 and newer. Funny thing is that the new accel. method is supposed to finally fix the issues with slow window 2D operations under composite managers (slow window resizing and all that), but the driver is having problems with said managers. The problem doesn't seem to be related to the new accel. mechanism (on or off, Kwin effects still cause a black screen), but maybe they messed up something with the changes.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    99

    Default

    Is there support for kernels > 2.6.31?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Merida
    Posts
    1,099

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by liangsuilong View Post
    Direct2D...

    It is too hard to understand why AMD do it.

    Easier to "port over" from the Windows Catalyst driver than implementing EXA? Both driver sets do share a lot of their base. Mr. B also lets us constantly know that since fglrx is mostly targeted to their workstation clients, I would imagine that implementing something that would require a drastic change in support would not be a great idea.

    Quote Originally Posted by mibo View Post
    Is there support for kernels > 2.6.31?
    2.6.32 works since the 10.1 driver.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Vienna, Austria; Germany; hello world :)
    Posts
    624

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Melcar View Post
    Easier to "port over" from the Windows Catalyst driver than implementing EXA? Both driver sets do share a lot of their base. Mr. B also lets us constantly know that since fglrx is mostly targeted to their workstation clients, I would imagine that implementing something that would require a drastic change in support would not be a great idea.



    2.6.32 works since the 10.1 driver.
    support for newer kernels has greatly improved (thanks to the community hackers - still not much love from ATI/AMD in this area):

    with a patch it even works with 2.6.33-rc*/2.6.33 !

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    99

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Melcar View Post
    2.6.32 works since the 10.1 driver.
    Tanks for the info!

    Cheers,
    mibo

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    311

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Melcar View Post
    Easier to "port over" from the Windows Catalyst driver than implementing EXA? Both driver sets do share a lot of their base. Mr. B also lets us constantly know that since fglrx is mostly targeted to their workstation clients, I would imagine that implementing something that would require a drastic change in support would not be a great idea.

    2.6.32 works since the 10.1 driver.
    I doubt there is any direct relationship between the names and the code. EXA is an acceleration architecture that is tied to the Open Source drivers. Even intel moved away from it and created UXA.

    The better way to think about it is !XAA. !XAA = NV's 2D, EXA (for Radeon), UXA (for Intel) and D2D (for ATI).

    Talking about EXA is needed for this or that, is no different than saying DRI2 is needed for this or that. They are Open Source architectures for Open Source drivers.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •