Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: Intel Sandy Bridge GPU Support Begins On Linux

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    15,138

    Default Intel Sandy Bridge GPU Support Begins On Linux

    Phoronix: Intel Sandy Bridge GPU Support Begins On Linux

    Intel launched the desktop "Clarkdale" and mobile "Arrandale" processors a few months back that boasted a number of architectural improvements and one of the big features was the integration of a graphics processor directly on the CPU itself. As we shared when testing out the Intel Core i5 530 processor, the Clarkdale graphics performance was fairly nice and worked quite well under Linux using an open-source driver besides a few bugs.The initial support was quite well as the Clarkdale Linux graphics support upbringing started months prior to the Core i3/i5 Clarkdale product launch...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=ODAxNA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Lodz, Poland
    Posts
    42

    Default

    200% of close to none is still not much. AMD's Fusion will trump over Sandy Bridge in terms of graphics performance.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Germany/NRW
    Posts
    510

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ferreira View Post
    200% of close to none is still not much. AMD's Fusion will trump over Sandy Bridge in terms of graphics performance.
    200% faster = 3 times the performance.
    That'd be actually quite a decent gpu imho.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    714

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zhick View Post
    200% faster = 3 times the performance.
    That'd be actually quite a decent gpu imho.
    Yes. My Dell 1420n is getting rather worn out.

    If I can get something with 3-times the performance and 10-15 hours of battery life, then I could easily justify dropping some good money on a replacement laptop-desktop system using it.

    Looking forward to the performance comparisons between AMD Fusion and Intel's IGP in the future. Open source drivers for the win.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    315

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ferreira View Post
    200% of close to none is still not much. AMD's Fusion will trump over Sandy Bridge in terms of graphics performance.
    It's like saying elephant hunting with a 38 special is bad let's try a 44 magnum.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    158

    Default

    Hmmm, now reconsidering the acquisition of a Gulftown

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    60

    Default

    the question is: will AMD drivers be better or worse than Intel's ?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,122

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by karl View Post
    the question is: will AMD drivers be better or worse than Intel's ?
    Hard to trust intel with delivering good drivers after GMA500....
    AMD has been ramping up for these drivers for a while now -- what do you think the reason is for all the open source work and documentation? They started in advance in order to build up the infrastructure so that when the fusion chips came out, they would be supported out of the box in full 3d.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    2,122

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by phoronix View Post
    Phoronix: Intel Sandy Bridge GPU Support Begins On Linux

    Intel launched the desktop "Clarkdale" and mobile "Arrandale" processors a few months back that boasted a number of architectural improvements and one of the big features was the integration of a graphics processor directly on the CPU itself. As we shared when testing out the Intel Core i5 530 processor, the Clarkdale graphics performance was fairly nice and worked quite well under Linux using an open-source driver besides a few bugs.The initial support was quite well as the Clarkdale Linux graphics support upbringing started months prior to the Core i3/i5 Clarkdale product launch...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=ODAxNA
    Little premature for them to be working on the drivers for the next thing when they still haven't delivered anything particularly useful for GMA500.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    983

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by droidhacker View Post
    Little premature for them to be working on the drivers for the next thing when they still haven't delivered anything particularly useful for GMA500.
    Not really, that's a different part of Intel. Holding these developers responsible for GMA500 is unfair.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •