Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 41

Thread: New xf86-video-ati Release Planned With KMS

  1. #21
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Germany/NRW
    Posts
    510

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Melcar View Post
    KMS kills 2D performance all across the board. However, it's not that bad with older chips (my 9800pro and 200m for example, and I would guess any pre r5xx chip as well); with those it remains rather usable. With my hd4850 KMS really screws things up (I will assume it's the same for any r6/7xx chip) as it is much much slower than UMS and certain applications are just unusable (Firefox being one).
    Maybe that's because 2d runs on the 3d-engine on those newer chips?
    With my x1900xt 2d seems very snappy, but I've only tested KDE-apps, not firefox or anything else.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    772

    Default

    I didn't notice any major performance problem with Firefox when I used KMS on my HD3450. I wasn't using it that long, but if it was as bad as people are saying I think I'd notice.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    157

    Default

    On my RS780 board, which is basically a HD3200 board, I don't have any slowdown and Firefox works without a glitch.
    Either there is something wrong with R700 based-boards (like the 2D made by the 3D engine) or there is something wrong with one of the stack of X provided by your distro.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Old Europe
    Posts
    932

    Default

    If I compare my desktop system (rv770) with my rather ancient notebook (r300),
    both on xorg-server 1.7.5, KMS, KWin (4.4), Linux 2.6.33 with mesa, drm and ddx from git,
    the notebook performs perfectly smooth while the desktop system feels not as snappy.

    Sounds plausible that recent chips (r600+) with a unified architecture require more
    optimization work for 2d acceleration than the "older" parts that feature fixed function 2d hardware
    that is now implemented using shaders. So it's (at least) one more layer, right?

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,543

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rvdboom View Post
    On my RS780 board, which is basically a HD3200 board, I don't have any slowdown and Firefox works without a glitch.
    Either there is something wrong with R700 based-boards (like the 2D made by the 3D engine) or there is something wrong with one of the stack of X provided by your distro.
    The RS780 is like the rest of the R600+ (HD2xxx and up) in that it doesn't have a 2D engine either. Based on the comments here (most 6xx/7xx seem to be slower but not RS780 IGP) my first guess at the bottleneck would be less acceleration of transfers between system and video memory on R600+, since IIRC some of the 2D accel hardware on 5xx and below is also used for upload/download acceleration. Just a guess though.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    772

    Default

    Maybe there's a DE/WM component to the problem? I was just running Fluxbox when I tested KMS.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    30

    Default

    I've been using KMS on my r600 ( integrated on my laptop motherboard, but with discreet memory ) for 2 months or so now. 2D is actually really snappy. It's also far more stable. Can't complain really.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    319

    Default

    are people seeing slow r600/700 running on AGP systems?

    also as someone else said make sure server 1.7 for KMS.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    2,933

    Default

    Everything has been running just fine here using r700 and KMS+DRI2.

    The game performance is not spectacular, but OpenArena, Nexuiz and a bunch of others run just fine and are playable.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    448

    Default My HD4890 PCIe system is running fine on F12.

    Quote Originally Posted by Melcar View Post
    KMS kills 2D performance all across the board. However, it's not that bad with older chips (my 9800pro and 200m for example, and I would guess any pre r5xx chip as well); with those it remains rather usable. With my hd4850 KMS really screws things up (I will assume it's the same for any r6/7xx chip) as it is much much slower than UMS and certain applications are just unusable (Firefox being one).
    I have KMS, DRI2 and compiz all running fine with my HD 4890 and F12. Full-screen video playback seems OK too. And now I've upgraded my kernel to 2.6.33 (and unearthed the new firmware!) my video playback is looking tear-free, even when playing "the birds" HD file.

    I think my xorg-x11-drv-ati is from git, but my libdrm and Mesa are definitely from F12's repositories still.

    [Mind you, the HD4890 is in a new quad-core i7 PC - maybe that's why I'm not noticing any performance drop?]

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •