Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 35

Thread: NVIDIA Recalls Linux Drivers Over Fan Speed Bug

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    South Finland
    Posts
    32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Max Spain View Post
    Watercooling FTW
    Passive cooling for the win...

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    52

    Default

    Basically they are paying 250$ per test just to be able to put a windows logo sticker on their product. Read up some stuff on wikipedia and they seem to run some basic tests on the driver, wouldn't be surprised if it was fully automated and would take a hour max without any kind of input.

    But this case just proves the drawbacks of em old binary blobs. Too bad Nvidia isn't planning on going open source or at least letting more people in on the thing.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Have a good day.
    Posts
    678

    Default

    I don't see how this is a problem exclusively related to closed source drivers.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/smiteme/4170866438/
    Posts
    50

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Melcar View Post
    Don't drivers have some sort of shut off mechanism that prevents damage to the GPU due to overheating? If not then they should.
    they do.
    and that's what happens here; the driver fails to act on a soft limit and the hardware shuts down due to a hard limit.
    You should be able to use the card again after it has cooled down (though doing this constantly will probably damage the card eventually)

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    783

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Max Spain View Post
    Watercooling FTW
    jup. When you see smoke, just dump a bucket of water on it

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Merida
    Posts
    1,114

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yotambien View Post
    I don't see how this is a problem exclusively related to closed source drivers.

    On open source drivers there is a better chance of people catching bugs and other anomalies, and getting the fix out faster.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Have a good day.
    Posts
    678

    Default

    That doesn't apply here. Nvidia is perfectly aware that there is a problem, and it's not like you would notice quicker that your card is being fried if you were using an open source driver. Actually, now that I think about it, I don't see any case were people would be more likely to find bugs or other anomalies in OSS software. As for fixing it quicker, I guess that's debatable and pretty much depends on the company, the project and the gravity of the problem we are talking about.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Have a good day.
    Posts
    678

    Default

    Dammit, you actually managed to distract me!

    My original point was, how is this related in ANY way to the driver being closed source?

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    52

    Default

    Well it's not related, there will be bugs like these on both blobs and OSS but the delta between the release of the driver and the fix would be usually lower on well managed OSS project(in my opinion), as you have more assets(so to speak, just more ppl that dig in the code or test the stuff more internally-like).

    But Nvidia is doing a good job with their blob thingy, just saying theres still room for improvement.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    579

    Default

    "This bug could potentially kill the NVIDIA graphics card due to overheating. "

    What else to say? Nvidia states they test their drivers in "special" environments bla bla bla. And they release a driver that can kill my 200$ card?

    AMD may do shiity fglrx drivers, but they don't kill anyone..... if not my patience!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •