Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 35

Thread: NVIDIA Recalls Linux Drivers Over Fan Speed Bug

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    756

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bulletxt View Post
    Nvidia states they test their drivers in "special" environments bla bla bla. And they release a driver that can kill my 200$ card?
    they've released drivers that plain did't work or had obvious bugs a couple of times, so there cannot be that much testing involved.
    It's usually less of a problem since they're not tied to the 1-driver-per-month schedule and will just dish out another release. But for anyone who's daring enough to always update their nvidia-drivers to the latest release, this sure wasn't the first surprise. The first one to actually kill hardware, though.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    569

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rohcQaH View Post
    they've released drivers that plain did't work or had obvious bugs a couple of times, so there cannot be that much testing involved.
    It's usually less of a problem since they're not tied to the 1-driver-per-month schedule and will just dish out another release. But for anyone who's daring enough to always update their nvidia-drivers to the latest release, this sure wasn't the first surprise. The first one to actually kill hardware, though.
    There's quite a difference between a fresh driver that breaks the usability of OpenGl, and a driver that sends your gpu to a "better world".

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    37

    Smile stop trowing stones on Nvidia

    Sure, they dont give out specs and docs, but at least they have a working binary driver, does amd have one? and stop complaining about the evil driver killing GPU`s!!! does somebody`s GPU "Went to a better place" because of the driver??? Dont forget, it was Nvidia Binary driver that made posible compiz, wine..... and so.I have an nvidia and wait everyday for Nouveau, but, the truth is that nouveau is not coming with decent OGL for a long time. Til then, go "Nvidia Binary Blob" thingy)

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Merida
    Posts
    1,098

    Default

    I think some GPUs did actually die.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    93

    Default

    I saw a high core temperature on my GTX260 last night (running 195.36.08, Ubuntu 9.10 AMD64) after suspend/resume. Core temp was 83C, compiz running, GPU/mem clocks @ 300/100MHz (idle).

    I downgraded to 195.30 (without reboot), and the GPU temp dropped 30C to 53C. The air coming out of the back of the GPU was the same speed and temperature (measured by feeling the air).

    I didn't try running Unigine Tropics or anything with 195.36.08 while the high temperature was being reported, just in case it was real. But, seeing as the air felt the same, I thought maybe it was just a driver bug reading the temperature incorrectly?
    Last edited by lem79; 03-07-2010 at 12:14 AM. Reason: Add version of OS

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    141

    Default

    i'm running 195.36.3 on my laptop. laptop graphics cards are cooled differently, right?

    this driver is about the same for me as with other drivers. with any blob driver i've used i get around 50C to 60C at idle and 60C to 75C under load. also, my laptop fan has only sped to full speed once in the past year that i've owned it.

    any of that bad?^

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    .ca
    Posts
    392

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Melcar View Post
    I think some GPUs did actually die.
    Wouldn't be surprised if the (defective) G84 and G86 are the first to burn.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xemanth View Post
    Passive cooling for the win...

    no passiv is Danger (i do not make fun)! only passiv with an massiv 120X120mm or 140X140mm Fan give you a real chance to win against that kind of bug.

    for exampel Furmark can burn a passiv VGA witout a real good case-fan construction.

    on my system my powersuply do have a 140X140 and my CPUs do have 2KG weight heatpiped Scythe Mugen-Infinity with 2. 120X120 fan and a case fan 120x120

    and my VGA is massiv heatpipep passiv cooled .

    yes passive but 3 pieces of 120X120 and 1 140X140 save the system

    if you build pure passiv furmark will burn your VGA! ..

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    South Finland
    Posts
    32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Qaridarium View Post
    no passiv is Danger (i do not make fun)! only passiv with an massiv 120X120mm or 140X140mm Fan give you a real chance to win against that kind of bug.

    for exampel Furmark can burn a passiv VGA witout a real good case-fan construction.

    on my system my powersuply do have a 140X140 and my CPUs do have 2KG weight heatpiped Scythe Mugen-Infinity with 2. 120X120 fan and a case fan 120x120

    and my VGA is massiv heatpipep passiv cooled .

    yes passive but 3 pieces of 120X120 and 1 140X140 save the system

    if you build pure passiv furmark will burn your VGA! ..
    What card do you have?

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Connecticut,USA
    Posts
    941

    Default

    I have an nVidia 7900GS in my custom desktop and using the 195.38.08 driver. Haven't seen the anomaly yet with my card, but there should be a killswitch within the card's BIOS or temp sensor that'll shutdown the card if it overheats.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •