Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: Version 1.98 Of GRUB2 Boot Loader Released

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    158

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pejakm View Post
    I'm also having troubles to boot into reiser4 with grub2... And grub2 is so damn slow.
    I'm glad it's not just me. Grub2 is slow here too.

    How did you configure yours? Mine (1.97) is configured to load a 37K font and a 65K background jpeg at 1280x720 from a small grub dedicated ext2 partition.

    On my computer a 2.6.33 kernel tailored for my hardware initializes and launches sysvinit faster than grub2 can initialize and show its menu. A boot loader booting slower than a full blown kernel is crazy.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Srpska Republic, Bosnia&Herzegovina
    Posts
    106

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StringCheesian View Post
    I'm glad it's not just me. Grub2 is slow here too.

    How did you configure yours? Mine (1.97) is configured to load a 37K font and a 65K background jpeg at 1280x720 from a small grub dedicated ext2 partition.

    On my computer a 2.6.33 kernel tailored for my hardware initializes and launches sysvinit faster than grub2 can initialize and show its menu. A boot loader booting slower than a full blown kernel is crazy.
    1.97.2 here. I've been using Grub2 with gfxmenu patches, but it was to damn slow, so I've installed original grub2. Still (to damn) slow, altough I'm using the plain default configuration (no fonts or images). Thinking of returning to good ol' grub.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    166

    Default lilo - grub2 and ruby

    Still on lilo since it's minimal and works on 64 bits native systems unlike grub 1.
    Last time I checked grub2, it requiered me to install ruby then I did not install it.
    Is this monstruous bloat and kludge still requiered in recent grub2?

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    52

    Default

    Hope Grub2 won't become bloatware. A boot manager has to be fast and useful and not have many useless options that are pure eyecandy.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Connecticut,USA
    Posts
    953

    Default

    I still use Grub1...loads fast and boots an OS fast.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    166

    Default kludge?

    Quote Originally Posted by SkyHiRider View Post
    Hope Grub2 won't become bloatware. A boot manager has to be fast and useful and not have many useless options that are pure eyecandy.
    If it still depends on ruby, it's fried.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    772

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sylware View Post
    If it still depends on ruby, it's fried.
    That's not actually a boot-time dependency, is it?

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    166

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ex-Cyber View Post
    That's not actually a boot-time dependency, is it?
    Last time I checked, I couldn't use it without installing ruby, so I finally used lilo.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sylware View Post
    Last time I checked, I couldn't use it without installing ruby, so I finally used lilo.
    Not to mention it depends on freetype if you want a graphical menu. It's more of a full blown operating system than a boot loader. And yes, it's painfully slow.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    4,991

    Default

    Maybe it soon tries to take on emacs :P

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •