Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 54

Thread: Intel Atom: NVIDIA ION vs. Radeon HD 4330 Graphics

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Have a good day.
    Posts
    678

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by duby229 View Post
    It's unfair because it's incomplete. It sure does show a performance delta, but it doesnt show everything that should be... Whether it was meant to be a quick test or not, incomplete is still incomplete. It doesnt show at least 2 other solutions that may or may not be better for you.
    'Fairness' and completeness are two different issues. It is true that the benchmarks didn't test all the possible options, but within what they tested there isn't anything unfair--well, the AMD card is apparently more powerful. So, two similar systems, two cards, two drivers, which one performs better? Probably most people expected these results, but the benchmark puts numbers to it: now you know for sure and in quantitative terms. Who could say before reading this article that radeon already pulls off 1/4 to 1/2 the frame rate achieved by Nvidia, and in a three times cheaper machine?

    That Phoronix couldn't test Fglrx because there wasn't support for the newest X server is a priceless anecdote, and one that reflects splendidly what an owner of one of these cards is expected to experience. On the other side of things, the OSS driver works with the newest bits as advertised. Although it can't really compete yet, it does work and its performance is within one order of magnitude of that of the optimised binary from the competition. I'm surprised I am the one seeing these results under a good light for radeon. Has the Freedom camp in Phoronix given up? That would make this place boring : D

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    622

    Thumbs down

    Sorry Phoronix this article is the most crap that i have ever seen. Whis this you kill your credibility.

    Many People doesn't care about OS vs CS Driver they see only in this Benchmark Ion is fasterr and nothing more.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    912

    Default

    People have been saying it's a crap article, but perhaps we should all give something more constructive?

    The article did make clear that the results were from a test using ubuntu 10.04, and that the video drivers were not equally matched. There was even a note that the intel cards couldn't be tested. But apparently that was glazed over by most readers who only saw an "ion vs radeon" test - so perhaps the layout could be changed, or more emphasis made in certain areas to point some things out? Sometimes people see a bunch of text and don't really read it, but rather look at a pretty graphic, so less text in areas could mean more. Can anyone offer anything else?

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,607

    Default

    Usually the 3d speed of ION does not interest anybody. The main purpose is to use vdpau as htpc, maybe using xbmc or something similar. I even tried to use vaapi with the latest prerelease fglrx drivers but not even that works yet. Why should somebody add an ati card when nvidia onboard would allow vdpau? That's the most stupid downgrade that i can think of! Even when the tests are repeated with fglrx they are useless.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    622

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mirv View Post
    People have been saying it's a crap article, but perhaps we should all give something more constructive?
    Because there is only 1 Point why ppl so angry. This test bench an FOSS vs Closed Driver.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Have a good day.
    Posts
    678

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nille View Post
    Because there is only 1 Point why ppl so angry. This test bench an FOSS vs Closed Driver.
    Yes, and everybody knows that the text file containing the license makes a huge difference in frame rate and overall performance.

    Hurry up! You are still on time to warn Phoronix before they benchmark Windows and MacOS vs Linux.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    622

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by yotambien View Post
    Yes, and everybody knows that the text file containing the license makes a huge difference in frame rate and overall performance.

    Hurry up! You are still on time to warn Phoronix before they benchmark Windows and MacOS vs Linux.

    No but the FOSS Driver is not complete and is not optimized.

  8. #38

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nille View Post
    No but the FOSS Driver is not complete and is not optimized.
    Do you think the FOSS driver will ever be "complete"?

  9. #39
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,582

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael View Post
    Do you think the FOSS driver will ever be "complete"?
    Is any driver "complete"?

  10. #40
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,582

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nille View Post
    No but the FOSS Driver is not complete and is not optimized.
    I'm sorry but that is beyond the lamest excuse ever. Would you say that it's not "fair" to benchmark wine vs windows as well?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •