Page 4 of 11 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 109

Thread: Ubuntu Gets Another ATI Catalyst Driver Handout

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    912

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TemplarGR View Post
    Could someone explain to me the reason AMD is not able to support newer Xservers and kernels like nvidia does? I mean the real reason, not some BS excuse. I simply cannot understand why they are doing this. I own an ATI 3870 and since i want to use Arch, i am restricted to the opensource driver(git). I do not want to install this crappy distro called Ubuntu, whose only puprose is easy install for n00bs, just to get proper 3d for a GPU i paid 210 euros.

    I seriously doubt i will buy again amd gpus in the near future, and this is a pitty since i had a nice gaming experience using my gpu on windows, and i am pleased by amd hardware in general.
    AMD have a list of officially supported distros. They support the stable versions of those distros with fglrx - and fglrx is primarily intended for the workstation market. Just because you don't like that doesn't make it invalid. It's a business choice.
    AMD does, however, support the open source drivers - which do work with all the latest & greatest kernels, xservers, etc.
    There's also nothing stopping you from sticking to previous xserver/kernel versions and using fglrx, if it's 3D stuff you need more than a version number.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,798

    Default

    You make it sound like we're being ungrateful for AMD's decisions to show the rest of us the middle finger.

    Sorry AMD! We're really terribly sorry that we're not using the outdated, crap distros you're supporting officially.

    Please continue to support specific distros only instead of Linux in general. It makes all our lives easier and generates more love towards you by every Linux user.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    84

    Default

    Quick report from the Arch Linux Catalyst users:

    Vi0L0 extra quickly produced the repo and a PKGBUILD for the new leaked driver. Works great with 2.6.33 (patch needed), 2.6.32 and latest Xorg server 1.7.5. http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.p...728348#p728348

    I was brave enough to try the GIT versions of Xorg-server and all the dependencies from the git, to see if Catalyst will be compatible with it. I can report that with udev support compiled in and dependencies correctly installed Xorg server GIT is greatly working with the leaked Catalyst 10.3-333 http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.p...728571#p728571

    Games, compiz and kwin working great so far. (r800 and udv2 still producing garbled output.)

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,641

    Default

    You really got vaapi working? I tested it with a karmic->lucid updated test install (as the lucid installer does not work) and fixed the detection of libAMDXvBA.so.1.0, but even vainfo is broken. If somebody with 32 bit wants to try (only tested 64 bit):

    http://kanotix.com/files/fix/mplayer-vaapi-latest.txt

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    912

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RealNC View Post
    You make it sound like we're being ungrateful for AMD's decisions to show the rest of us the middle finger.

    Sorry AMD! We're really terribly sorry that we're not using the outdated, crap distros you're supporting officially.

    Please continue to support specific distros only instead of Linux in general. It makes all our lives easier and generates more love towards you by every Linux user.
    AMD probably think: we're sorry you're using fglrx drivers in an area that we don't support. We're sorry that the "outdate, crap distros" are the ones our workstation markets are using.
    Really, if you've got that much of a problem, using the open source drives - which AMD actively support as well.
    I've got nothing against people wanting earlier support from the fglrx drivers, but AMD is most definitely not giving anyone the middle finger.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    84

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kano View Post
    You really got vaapi working? I tested it with a karmic->lucid updated test install (as the lucid installer does not work) and fixed the detection of libAMDXvBA.so.1.0, but even vainfo is broken. If somebody with 32 bit wants to try (only tested 64 bit):

    http://kanotix.com/files/fix/mplayer-vaapi-latest.txt
    Well, using xvba-video 0.6.8-1
    aur/libva-sds 0.31.0_1_10-2

    and a 2178360 byte sized libAMDXvBA so
    it seems to work with mplayer-vaapi
    Using xorg-1.7.5.902 i tested. Will look at 1.8 later.

    I suggest you to look at this: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4321633/catalyst-beta.tar.gz

    the package made by Vi0L0 that can be used to build the installer pkg locally.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    84

    Default

    btw, the watermark is gone now for my hd 5650 mobility.. so this 10.4 beta (10.3-333) contains support for it at last.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    27

    Default

    Ok I did it. Using livecd I chrooted myself into my ubuntu partition, then I installed old catalyst 10.2. And now 2D is working again.

    Is there any safe way to install this newest drivers ?

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Croatia
    Posts
    83

    Default

    Can someone tell me how to actually install this driver from launchpad.I must be doing something wrong.Someone please post list of commands.
    (i have a intel x64 system with hd4870)

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,641

    Default

    @krionius

    32 or 64 bit?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •