Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 37 of 37

Thread: GNOME Shell 2.29.1 Arrives w/ New Stuff

  1. #31

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackStar View Post
    Once you pick something, you stick with it unless there is a *very* good reason to change. It doesn't matter that KDE became non-commercial at some point, because by that time it was too late: the choice was already made.

    Even if KDE is superior to Gnome nowadays (I disagree), the difference is not large enough to justify the change. Doubly so for commercial customers, who treat change as the devil.
    This is now clear and what can I realize RHEL doesn't aim at typical desktops, so like RahulSundaram said: "The big picture is that, the choice of desktop environment is irrelevant to many of what is really important to customers.". I was wondering why did they choose Gnome, but like I noticed before it's also clear now. It wouldn't be clear for me if they would aim at the same target as Ubuntu, but I believe they're not aiming there. I was also wondering why did Ubuntu choose Gnome, but it seem they're making an OS X clone and Gnome is probably more OS X like then KDE.

    Your complaints do sound somewhat trivial:

    - yes, you have to use gconf to edit button placement but you can also download one of the dozen tweak apps in existence. Interestingly, none of the users I support has asked me for a way to tweak the buttons (I guess Ubuntu 10.04 will change that).

    - no there's no GUI for screensaver preferences. Still, who in their right mind uses screensavers nowadays? That's a Win98 relic. (Or do you really enjoying having your laptop/desktop fans ramp up and power consumption jump by 200% when you are not using your computer? Doesn't really make sense.)

    - what icons can't you sort?
    Yes, they're trivial (my main objections are related to some applications, but it doesn't matter right now). Ok, I can agree with the first and the second and I didn't know there exist some tweaking apps. I was talking about the desktop icons. I don't remember if there's an option to sort them (I was using the newest, stable Fedora release one or two weeks ago).

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    248

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackStar View Post
    We support Gnome, because it provides the most sane, intuitive and consistent experience, as well as the best applications in the Linux world.
    Quote Originally Posted by BlackStar View Post
    Gnome is very customizable.

    ROTFL ... Seriously that was the best joke I've heard this week

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Under the bridge
    Posts
    2,142

    Default

    The only people who try to argue that Gnome isn't customizable are KDE trolls. I wonder why that is.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Hellas
    Posts
    1,045

    Default

    Gnome, unlike, windows or osx is very customizable. KDE is just a bit more.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Under the bridge
    Posts
    2,142

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Apopas View Post
    Gnome, unlike, windows or osx is very customizable. KDE is just a bit more.
    There's a rather big difference between "not customizable" and "less customizable than KDE".

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Hellas
    Posts
    1,045

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackStar View Post
    There's a rather big difference between "not customizable" and "less customizable than KDE".
    I didn't disagree.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Under the bridge
    Posts
    2,142

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Apopas View Post
    I didn't disagree.
    Never said you did.

    Some other people posting here, on the other hand...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •