Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23

Thread: Unigine Heaven 2.0 Linux Performance

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    197

    Default

    wow, it works 5fps with tesselation on but I was almost sure, that you can run it only on HD58xx hardware

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    33

    Default

    I got about 16 fps on a HD3870(fglrx) on standard settings. I'm more interested in the difference between Windows and Linux. I couldn't test on my windows partition as the stupid thing has de-registered because of a HD ID change and couldn't get internet and serial to work.

    On KDE the desktop messed up after exiting the demo. Fonts small and plasmoid-panels where changed. I have my desktop icons in a folder-view so I guess they would have been messed up too if they were placed at set positions on a desktop-view based desktop.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 0e8h View Post
    I got about 16 fps on a HD3870(fglrx) on standard settings. I'm more interested in the difference between Windows and Linux. I couldn't test on my windows partition as the stupid thing has de-registered because of a HD ID change and couldn't get internet and serial to work.

    On KDE the desktop messed up after exiting the demo. Fonts small and plasmoid-panels where changed. I have my desktop icons in a folder-view so I guess they would have been messed up too if they were placed at set positions on a desktop-view based desktop.
    Go to the KDE settings app and change the resolution back and forth

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Merida
    Posts
    1,105

    Default





  5. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    5,411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Melcar View Post



    can you test this on 64bit to?

    why is windows faster?????

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,641

    Default

    64 bit does not help much, at max i saw a diff of 0.5 fps in the minimum fps. Too low to really gain something visable.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Merida
    Posts
    1,105

    Default

    My Windows install is a bit "fresher" than my Ubuntu install, since I rarely touch it these days. That could be causing the slow numbers. Also, on Ubuntu the demo does tend to run a little choppy at times while on W7 it's "smooth" for most of the time.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Third Rock from the Sun
    Posts
    6,584

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Qaridarium View Post
    why is windows faster?????
    This drop in performance seems to be only effecting the ATI cards. On Nvidia cards the performance is almost identical.

    http://techgage.com/article/unigines...linux_support/

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    4

    Default

    Hi,

    I did some benchmarking

    Config:
    GTX 285 1GB
    QX9650 @ 3 GHz
    Archlinux 64bit

    Tested at:
    1024x768, window
    1280x720, window, 8xAA
    1280x1024, fullscreen, 8xAA
    1920x1200, fullscreen
    1920x1200, fullscreen, 2xAA
    1920x1200, fullscreen, 4xAA
    3840x1200, fullscreen

    Screenshots below:
    1024x768, window


    1280x720, window, 8xAA


    1280x1024, fullscreen, 8xAA


    1920x1200, fullscreen


    1920x1200, fullscreen, 2xAA


    1920x1200, fullscreen, 4xAA


    3840x1200, fullscreen

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    285

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deanjo View Post
    This drop in performance seems to be only effecting the ATI cards. On Nvidia cards the performance is almost identical.

    http://techgage.com/article/unigines...linux_support/
    Not bad... much better than I expected.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •