Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 42

Thread: More Backporting Madness: X Server 1.8 To 1.7

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    515

    Default

    Backport or not. I just tried it on a livecd and I must say. IMPRESSIVE 2d performance on my hd4860 :-)

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,779

    Default

    Then I'd say you're easy to impress.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    984

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by V!NCENT View Post
    Debian stable is stable and old.
    Debian bleeding edge is bleeding edge.
    Something is missing in between and that is Ubuntu; mostly stable but also new features.
    Exactly.

    I guess we'll have to wait and see.
    I've been using Lucid for 2 weeks now and really the only thing to complain about is the quality of the binary fglrx driver, but that's something that affects every distro.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    510

    Default

    I do love the X.org edgers repository. Nouveau 3D in an easily installed package! The only downside is that it breaks every other update. But that's why it's experimental crack for technology junkies.

    As for all the backporting, I'll let them decide what's best for them. If they think they can handle the workload, then by all means, do it. It's difficult for upstreaming bugs though... the bug squad must know their packages intimately for this all to work.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    315

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RealNC View Post
    Then I'd say you're easy to impress.
    Gallium doubled 2d performance on nvidia cards over nv driver. If that doesn't impress you. Nothing will. I can only imagine what the ATI group is doing with real help and regular information dumps from ATI.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    315

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Remco View Post
    I do love the X.org edgers repository. Nouveau 3D in an easily installed package! The only downside is that it breaks every other update. But that's why it's experimental crack for technology junkies.

    As for all the backporting, I'll let them decide what's best for them. If they think they can handle the workload, then by all means, do it. It's difficult for upstreaming bugs though... the bug squad must know their packages intimately for this all to work.
    I don't think it has anything to do with nouveau. I think they are just wanting to dump HAL for udev because they don't want hal hanging around for 2 more years. I think they are just going to put all the udev changes from 1.8 into 1.7.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,779

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hephasteus View Post
    Gallium doubled 2d performance on nvidia cards over nv driver. If that doesn't impress you. Nothing will. I can only imagine what the ATI group is doing with real help and regular information dumps from ATI.
    I'm gonna get impressed when I can have a Linux desktop that performs better compared with what I get when I use Windows and OS X. Right now, it's not even close.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    515

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RealNC View Post
    Then I'd say you're easy to impress.
    Well does 'better' / same 2d performance as in windows 7 impress you? Thats what I got. I have the 'old' windows 7 RC installed, and its 2d acceleration is comparable with the one I get in Lucid.

    The only thing which is still a bit sloppy is flash (big surprise).

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    Lol I tried KDE 4.4.1 on a four year old Dell business desktop with a Pentium dual core on Fedora with the experimental driver package an compositing Kwin to the max and it's so blazingly fast that it gives Win7 and even Mac OS X a run for its money.

    If X manages to get even faster drivers than my brain can't keep up with it.

    I am not going to comment on DE's, my point is that mesa drivers are already fast as hell!

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    519

    Default

    I think two opposite prevailing views are in conflict here:

    1. A Long Term Support (LTS) release should be stable
    2. An LTS should be pretty current when released, otherwise it will become archaic during its lifetime


    I also think these two are not necessarily mutually exclusive. In fact, the reason they seem contradictory is based on a ridiculous claim, IMHO:

    3. A distribution release can be stable from day one.


    You need to let a month or two go, and then get the release plus the first batch of updates and fixes. Alternatively, get it from a vendor (Dell, HP, System 76, Zareason, etc) who will have gone some extensive testing on the hardware they are selling you.

    So, in short, the focus should be to release something current, which would mean, among other things, all this crazy backporting would never come into play.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •