Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 40

Thread: I want to help!

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    983

    Default

    Wasn't there talk about releasing the old r200 programming manuals, for use as an introduction to writing drivers? Is it still on the back burner?

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,284

    Default

    Still on the back burner and probably not worth doing now that fixed function has pretty much disappeared. I started editing the HowVideoCardsWork wiki page instead to include information about fixed function and shader-based GPUs but lost so much work on timeouts that I gave up for the moment

    Will try again later, doing all the work offline and *then* pasting into the page. Fingers crossed.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    Thanks in advance for your efforts, Bridgman!

    BTW all this documentation, even on how to pull, compile and set up... Is this all in response to the call for X documentation a while back?

    Also, there is the 2D and 3D driver. Is Gallium both, or 'just' the 3D part?

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,284

    Default

    I think the call for X documentation was more related to X itself; this is more aimed at the drivers. Strictly speaking only one of the three driver components (the ddx) can be considered part of X anyways, although X does include logic to route 3D operations to an external 3D driver as well.

    The Gallium3D framework is intended to be used by both 2D and 3D drivers, although most people talk about it as a replacement for the current 3D HW driver layer in Mesa. The TG/VMWare folks are building an entire driver stack on top of Gallium3D, although the target hardware in that case is the emulated GPU that their workstation software exposes.

    I guess the best way to think about Gallium3D is as a "hardware layer" for acceleration.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    86

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by V!NCENT View Post
    Also, there is the 2D and 3D driver. Is Gallium both, or 'just' the 3D part?
    For the moment, gallium is concerned with 3D, however iirc there were plans to implement xorg support as a gallium state tracker, which would make it both.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    983

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bridgman View Post
    Still on the back burner and probably not worth doing now that fixed function has pretty much disappeared. I started editing the HowVideoCardsWork wiki page instead to include information about fixed function and shader-based GPUs but lost so much work on timeouts that I gave up for the moment

    Will try again later, doing all the work offline and *then* pasting into the page. Fingers crossed.
    This would be much appreciated of course!

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    OK. So if I am understanding this correctly (and please correct me if I am wrong):

    The past
    X ran on the CPU only and dumped everything to a framebuffer with a driver.
    Mesa was a software only graphics lib that dumped into X, which X in turn processed to be part of what it dumped to the framebuffer.

    Later on
    X got code to offload work to graphics cards. This being a 2D graphics card driver for hardware acceleration.
    Mesa also got code (hardware abstraction layer (this being drivers)) to offload work to the graphics card, but still had to do this through X.

    Further in time
    DRI can around so Mesa could talk directly to the graphics hardware with drivers to eliminate latency.

    today
    Instead of drivers being part of X/Mesa, Mesa is now part of the driver (state tracker on top of it) and work is underway for X to become a state tracker too (or is able to act like one *ouch headaches*).

    Memory management is now done in the Linux kernel (and soon in *BSDs too) through KMS to eliminate even more latency and reduce duplication in code.


    So now a question too:
    All these other state trackers, like OpenCL and Vector graphics and whatnot... where are those? Are they in Mesa? Or can they be everywhere and just act as a state tracker?

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    86

    Default

    As I understand the state of play

    The past:
    In the distant past, graphics hardware was accessed by memory-mapped io through the /dev inode. It could only be accessed by one process at a time, which was generally the X server. The X server drivers used XAA, which was adequate for drawing simple geometry, but lacked the blending options necessary to support anti-aliasing and accelerated compositing.

    Later on, DRI happened as people wanted 3d apps to be able to access the hardware without all the instructions having to go through the x server - this entailed putting arbitration for multiple command streams into the kernel (the DRM). X was responsible for managing memory, and it was kindof limited in how good a job it could do from that position (leading to more swappage than necessary) and for setting up the context for the dri slave (ie keeping it updated on what portions of the screen it was allowed to draw to). Mesa provided drivers using the contexts set up by Xorg in order to accelerate Opengl via this mechanism.

    Later on, the Xrender extension happened and X gained the ability to blend (using porter-duff compositing operations), and EXA came along to support the necessary driver hooks to support this.

    Then people started tinkering with composited desktops and things started sucking. DRI contexts had the rendering slave output to a section of the front buffer, bypassing x, which would look broken if people were making the window that context was in do ridiculous wobbly shenanigans, plus was hardly appropriate for the contexts the window manager would use itself in drawing the fancy desktop. XGL attempted to solve this by starting an X server, creating a window in it, fullscreening that, starting opengl in that context and presenting *itself* as an X server, wrapping the original X drawing commands to opengl, and providing accelerated indirect contexts by a passthrough mechanism. Nvidia were less than thrilled about this, as it meant Xgl would need its passthrough mechanism updated to support any new gl extensions, so AIGLX appeared instead, enabling the Xserver itself to use mesa contexts to provide acceleration for indirect contexts.

    This all lead to exposing faults with DRI1/DRM - the excessive swapping when switching between contexts, and inability to accelerate drawing to redirected surfaces hurt its credibility for a composited desktop.

    ..hence DRI2, which incorporated memory management in the kernel, hopefully reducing swapping, as well as enabled lockless sharing of the accelerator, and introduced the ability to accelerate redirected surfaces.

    In addition to this, mesa is being restructured (gallium) in recognition of the need to go to a more compiler-based architecture as accelerators became more processor-like and opengl usage became more programming-
    like. The thing about compiling is that it's typically done in several stages - languages are parsed into internal intermediate representations, which is then fed to the stage that translates to the particular chip's languages, with optimisation passes in between. This makes it possible to put multiple front-ends on the compiler innards of GPUs with a gallium drivers - these are the "state trackers", which will at first be opengl, but adding an Xorg driver as a state tracker could kill the need for individual chip drivers in X. Other state trackers are being played with, like OpenCL, Direct3d (for WINE), OpenVG(standard 2d graphics accel) etc etc etc.

  9. #29

    Default

    very interesting/informative post dustman,

    one thing though

    Quote Originally Posted by DuSTman View Post
    Other state trackers are being played with... Direct3d (for WINE)...
    i thought as of latest news D3d state tracker was only being used for windows virtualization and wouldn't be release for linux?

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    983

    Default

    You're probably thinking of the work VMware is doing. There's also another effort but AFAIK somebody doing it just for fun:
    http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...item&px=NzkwOQ

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •