Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22

Thread: X.Org Server 1.8.0 Is Here

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    13,417

    Default X.Org Server 1.8.0 Is Here

    Phoronix: X.Org Server 1.8.0 Is Here

    X Server 1.8 is here. Being developed under a new process, this new X Server from the X.Org project was given a 31 March release date. It wasn't released on Wednesday as planned, but it's coming today -- just two days later. Based upon the sizable delays in earlier X.Org Server releases, this is not bad at all...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=ODExOA

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    in front of my box :p
    Posts
    733

    Default

    Now if that this is hopefully stable I'd be happy to emerge it asap. And kick out hal.
    Just recently hald-addon-storage froze a box of mine randomly, out of nothing. Going to "101%" CPU, means I could barely log in and kick it or reisaub, the keystrokes took many seconds to get accepted. And I never liked these tons of fdi files anyway. The idea was nice but the reality turned out to be improvable. Good to see xorg is now doing without it.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    57

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adarion View Post
    Going to "101%" CPU, means I could barely log in and kick it or reisaub, the keystrokes took many seconds to get accepted.
    Sure it's not nice for a process to go haywire like this, but OTOH it looks like you also have a very flaky CPU scheduler. In the old times we used to run SETI@home at 100% CPU on 166MHz boxes and were able to type without problems.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    84

    Default

    Glad to see HAL dead. Anyone want to take bets on how long it takes fglrx to support it?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    178

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vash63 View Post
    Glad to see HAL dead. Anyone want to take bets on how long it takes fglrx to support it?
    Hang on. I better get my tools out to prepare a rune stone. This site will not be around when that happens

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,762

    Default

    Genesis actually describes fglrx support for 1.8. There's talk about seals being broken, the dead rising from their graves, support for X.Org 1.8, etc.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    101

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RealNC View Post
    Genesis actually describes fglrx support for 1.8. There's talk about seals being broken, the dead rising from their graves, support for X.Org 1.8, etc.
    I'm pretty sure that's Revelation you're thinking of.

    As I've said before, I don't have any hope for fglrx. It should really be put out of its misery, and the resources supporting it should be directed toward the open-source driver.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,762

    Default

    Oops, yes, Revelation. Genesis is the other text, describing kernel 2.6.34 support

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    225

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by waucka View Post
    I'm pretty sure that's Revelation you're thinking of.

    As I've said before, I don't have any hope for fglrx. It should really be put out of its misery, and the resources supporting it should be directed toward the open-source driver.
    a closed and open driver is actually good to have... now we have intel with an opensource driver, nvidia with a closed driver and ati with both.

    Besides choosing a driver you can also choose you licence flavors

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    131

    Default

    Why exactly is udev so much better than HAL?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •