Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 73

Thread: R500 Mesa Is Still No Match To An Old Catalyst Driver

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    783

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by monraaf View Post
    Basiclly Xv is useless with fglrx.
    The colors are slightly off and there's no vsync. Not good, but not "useless" either.

    I'm using xv on fglrx for all my movies, neither me nor anyone else watching with me ever had a problem with that.


    but yeah, I'd switch to the OS drivers if there was basic evergreen acceleration.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Have a good day.
    Posts
    678

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by monraaf View Post
    That benchmark used Xv and only looked at CPU usage, not picture quality. This is where radeon is far superior to fglrx. Basiclly Xv is useless with fglrx. Sure with fglrx you can get similar picture quality to radeon if you use GL but that also restricts you in your choice of video player.
    Perhaps I watched a lot of movies with the wrong colours or something, but I used to have installed both drivers and switched very often between them. It's almost sure that I watched a number of the very same videos with both Radeon and Fglrx. I think I would have realised it if it was obvious. Is this something you get with compositing or what?

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Have a good day.
    Posts
    678

    Default

    Ah, only now I saw the screenshots. I wouldn't bet my life on it not happening to me. I wouldn't say "useless" either.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    1,002

    Default

    Well, I would call this pretty useless.



    But if you can't see the tearing or if it doesn't bother you, all the better for you.

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    50

    Default

    Why dont you try vaapi:gl for fglrx and say goodbye to flickering? It works pretty nice with catalyst 10.4 beta - unless you have evergreen card on board...
    Ofcourse its still useless for flash videos, where oss driver owns, but you can watch all other videos with mplayer-vaapi without problems.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    50

    Default

    (by flash videos i mean those watched with flashplayer via website, flv via mplayer-vaapi also works good)

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Have a good day.
    Posts
    678

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by monraaf View Post
    Well, I would call this pretty useless.



    But if you can't see the tearing or if it doesn't bother you, all the better for you.
    But monraaf, of course that it would bother me to the point of calling it useless. I may not have a clinical eye for video quality but I'm not blind either. Obviously, I didn't have that problem during the ~2 years I used Fglrx. And obviously, I'm not denying that it exists under certain conditions and with certain hardware.

    By the way, those artifacts pretty much look like some VHS ones. Perhaps they should include a tracking control? : D

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,674

    Default

    Well it is really the case that some ppl see tearing and other rendering errors like skipped frames and others do not. Maybe it has got something to do with the monitor/tv used for output or if the eyes are "trained" to look for those kinds of errors. I know how it has to look, everything else is certainly an error. Some never watch movies on the pc and others do that very often, so some are more effected by problems than others. But that xv does not work correctly is a very old problem. I am not sure if it affected R500 (never had such a card), but with the first R600 which is the last supported for current fglrx driver you have got this problem. xv worked with the oss driver relatively fast with much better quality - at least enough for lower bitrate video which does not require hw accelleration.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,806

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kano View Post
    Well it is really the case that some ppl see tearing and other rendering errors like skipped frames and others do not. Maybe it has got something to do with the monitor/tv used for output or if the eyes are "trained" to look for those kinds of errors. I know how it has to look, everything else is certainly an error. Some never watch movies on the pc and others do that very often, so some are more effected by problems than others. But that xv does not work correctly is a very old problem. I am not sure if it affected R500 (never had such a card), but with the first R600 which is the last supported for current fglrx driver you have got this problem. xv worked with the oss driver relatively fast with much better quality - at least enough for lower bitrate video which does not require hw accelleration.
    Then again, there were some hardware differences in R600 and R500 related to 2D rendering. Maybe the devs missed something (or quite a few things) while implementing Xv on fglrx? It's pretty obvious from the oss drivers that it actually could be made to work.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    6,674

    Default

    Of course they did something wrong, they implemented it that xv is possible but not that it uses vsync.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •