Page 8 of 9 FirstFirst ... 6789 LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 90

Thread: Whoops, ATI's Evergreen Will Bring A New Driver

  1. #71
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Linuxland
    Posts
    5,103

    Default

    V!ncent, if you want to prove you have accel, post Xorg.0.log instead.

  2. #72
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,458

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by smitty3268 View Post
    You guys would never have even heard of this if bridgman hadn't announced it, it just would have been another branch of code that came and went silently.
    Bingo... and I wouldn't have said anything about it if I hadn't just finished telling the mesa dev list folks that we were going to do something different an hour before we had the latest meeting.

    I kinda felt it was important to tell them what was going on, since the implication was that the 7xx-to-Evergreen transition might end up being a good opportunity for jumping to Gallium3D despite having said the exact opposite an hour earlier

  3. #73
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    3,133

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bridgman View Post
    Bingo... and I wouldn't have said anything about it if I hadn't just finished telling the mesa dev list folks that we were going to do something different an hour before we had the latest meeting.

    I kinda felt it was important to tell them what was going on, since the implication was that the 7xx-to-Evergreen transition might end up being a good opportunity for jumping to Gallium3D despite having said the exact opposite an hour earlier
    What's with the Evergreen codename anyway? Is it the first one that AMD named instead of ATI? Or do you guys just suddenly hate numbers now? It seems like it would be a lot simpler to just keep having increasing numbers, now we have to try and remember which names come before others - yuck.

  4. #74
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,458

    Default

    No, we just like trees... and islands...

  5. #75
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    437

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by salva84 View Post
    You are right, I have an ATI 5850, the fglx drivers are really slow even scrolling web pages in firefox.... and the open source drivers are always "coming".... For me, the solution I've found is to execute Linux in a Virtualbox machine inside Windows 7. No more problem with graphics, suspend / hibernate, I can make a backup of the whole system, and I dont have to reboot to play some games.
    See, I know exactly what you mean. I have been a loyal ATI user since the Radeon 9700 days. I started converting myself to a full time Linux user in the Radeon X1900 era (3~4 years ago?) and the experience has always been like what you said Fglrx has always been a crap, endless crashing, slowing down, corrption, watermark?! And OSS driver by that time does not even support 2D acceleration in my X1900, so I waited and waited and waited still I sold my X1900 and it still doesn't work in Linux. My next purchase, the most regretful one was HD 2900 PRO. I could have gone to nVidia and be happy once and for all, but 2900 drag me into the same loop hole. Fglrx after two years was still just like before, slowing down in scroll, card fan fires up at full speed, lock ups and shit, and they got X1000 series working in OSS driver! but I upgraded to HD2000 family, by which time the OSS driver still did not support yet. So another year of wait. And this keeps on going for my HD 4850. You see, you can never get out of this waiting loop hole unless you jump ship to use something else. You can either use new NVidia cards, or you can use ATI cards which are 5 years old. But new ATI card on Linux? come on that's never gonna ever happen.

  6. #76
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    62

    Default

    Yeah but if you jump ship you get a new card with a two year + old architecture. At least with ati drivers get better with age like a fine wine, nvidia well as Barack says, "You can put lipstick on a pig".

  7. #77
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    86

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jamey0824 View Post
    as Barack says, "You can put lipstick on a pig".
    Have you ever tried that? It's not easy.

  8. #78
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    2,264

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by curaga View Post
    V!ncent, if you want to prove you have accel, post Xorg.0.log instead.
    I never said I had accel... I just said it was working with 2D.

    I was hoping someone would tell me by posting that info if it was accelerating 2D.

    Judging by the massive spikes in CPU usage it is probably just framebuffer support

  9. #79
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Toronto-ish
    Posts
    7,458

    Default

    Yep, if you're using the radeon driver then you have modesetting (either UMS or KMS) and shadowfb acceleration.

    Shadowfb is surprisingly fast though, since the software rendering happens in CPU memory, which from a CPU's POV is maybe 100x as fast as video memory, then the shadow frame buffer (in CPU memory) is periodically copied to the real frame buffer.

  10. #80
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Russe, Bulgaria
    Posts
    511

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bridgman View Post
    Bingo... and I wouldn't have said anything about it if I hadn't just finished telling the mesa dev list folks that we were going to do something different an hour before we had the latest meeting.

    I kinda felt it was important to tell them what was going on, since the implication was that the 7xx-to-Evergreen transition might end up being a good opportunity for jumping to Gallium3D despite having said the exact opposite an hour earlier
    I am with Bridgman here. Just try to jump to Gallium3D, since that will help evolve the whole stack, not just one single driver ( Ever ).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •