Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 41

Thread: ALSA 1.0.23 Is Here With Better Linux Audio

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    553

    Default

    Use Jack sound server for low latency. I think you're complaining more about PulseAudio, which has got nothing to do with Alsa as a driver.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,618

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bulletxt View Post
    Use Jack sound server for low latency. I think you're complaining more about PulseAudio, which has got nothing to do with Alsa as a driver.
    No I don't. I'm complaining about ALSA. And could you explain to me how Jack will help with latency since it needs ALSA to play sounds?

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    553

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RealNC View Post
    No I don't. I'm complaining about ALSA. And could you explain to me how Jack will help with latency since it needs ALSA to play sounds?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JACK_Audio_Connection_Kit

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    94

    Default

    and yet, despite having a bug report open for close to 3 years, with numerous contributions, i still have no proper support for my laptop.

    thing has been tagged 'assigned' since late 2007 ......

    go figure.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    3,618

    Default

    You don't get it. JACK does not offer sound card drivers. It uses ALSA. And ALSA is high latency. ALSA is the bottleneck JACK can't get around. Unless JACK magically makes ALSA perform better.

    Can't be that hard to understand.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Under the bridge
    Posts
    2,045

    Default

    ALSA is high latency? Got any links?

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    141

    Default

    @RealNC
    I think the minor collection of sound cards supported in oss4, is the reason why it is not widely supported in different distributions.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    141

    Default

    EDIT:
    Oh and they also have some pretty strict licenses.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    67

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RealNC View Post
    You don't get it. JACK does not offer sound card drivers. It uses ALSA. And ALSA is high latency. ALSA is the bottleneck JACK can't get around. Unless JACK magically makes ALSA perform better.

    Can't be that hard to understand.
    Yes, Jack does make ALSA perform better - and there's nothing magic about that. Normal ALSA applications use dmix or PulseAudio for mixing, which are OK but have less than ideal latency for some uses. Jack does direct hardware access with no underlying mixer layer. It also uses much more aggressive buffer settings than ALSA applications normally do (mainly because normally it's more important to protect against dropouts than shave a few milliseconds off latency).

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    553

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RealNC View Post
    You don't get it. JACK does not offer sound card drivers. It uses ALSA. And ALSA is high latency. ALSA is the bottleneck JACK can't get around. Unless JACK magically makes ALSA perform better.

    Can't be that hard to understand.
    Alsa is high latency? Believe me, it's you that don't get it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •