Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 31

Thread: Ubuntu 10.04 Is Hit By Major X.Org Memory Leak

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    111

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mendieta View Post
    Wait, you didn't let me finish with my proposal, LOL

    Incidentally, I had the chance of browsing some KDE code for a bug fix, and it's all naked pointers, even though Qt provides some shared pointers. Oh well.
    Pointers are not bad at all especially in the Qt case where any QObject can have a parent (if the destructor of the parent is called any child is destructed as well).

    In fact if you want that a dialog is deleted when it is hidden you can simply do that by a flag and not resort on the parent being destroyed, or you could also reuse the dialog later.

    Probably in most cases you looked at shared pointers would be a complete unnecessary overhead. If you use smartpointers everywhere + other "always secure"-measures you should probably use a different programming-language that was designed for that.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    66

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shining Arcanine View Post
    Is this issue isolated to Ubuntu's hacked together hybrid of xorg-server 1.7.x and 1.8.x or does it affect upstream's sources too?
    https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Testing/GEMLeak

    One possible solution is to roll back the GLX 1.4 enablement patches, and the patch which caused the memory leak to appear. These GLX patches were produced by RedHat and incorporated into Debian, they were not brought in due to Ubuntu-specific requirements and thus it is believed dropping these patches would not impact any of Lucid's development goals. The one risk to be mindful of is if any userspace applications have come to depend on the newer GLX functionality.
    http://packages.debian.org/changelog....6-2/changelog

    xorg-server (2:1.7.3.901-1) experimental; urgency=low

    [ Julien Cristau ]
    * Enable GLX 1.4 on DRI2 and swrast (from upstream, via F12).
    I hope this answers your question.

  3. #23

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by monraaf View Post
    Good thing they found out about this before release and are going to fix it. Of course that doesn't stop the Ubuntu haters from taking cheap shots at Ubuntu
    Interesting because that's the first thing I thought too when I read the story.
    Imagine fixing bugs Before releasing software. Good luck with that catching on.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    233

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phoronix
    Ubuntu 10.04 Is Hit By Major X.Org Memory Leak
    This way or writing sounds like Ubuntu 10.04 will be a broken release full of memory leaks. You can write a better title, like "Ubuntu 10.04 develoment/beta release is hit by major X.Org memory leak".

    The problem would have been if the release the "stable" 10.04 with the memory leak. It is only a beta version, this is sometimes the price for using it.

    The Ubuntu developers should use more Upstream stable code, and not take some more or less good known stable code and start to patch it, they will get less users and devs to test it.
    Why did they not take the Xserver 1.8 code, release 10.04, and push updates with 1.8.1, and 1.8.2, etc. but only the 1.8.x serie. More or less as they do with the kernel?

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    437

    Default

    I'd rather wait for several months till they get everything right. This timed release is getting more and more ridiculous, previous releases were full of bugs

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    12

    Default Ubuntu

    HI all


    Ubuntu is somewhere in the mix.

    To the left of me I hear newer, newer, its already out dated.

    To the right of me I hear bugs, to many bugs, more testing, release to fast.

    Up in front of me the TWOCLICKINMEMENOWNOWS say its to hard.

    Behind me I hear, eh bloated.


    Ubuntu is at it every day doing there GNU/Linux thing, there way. I respect that.
    I don't respect FUD or drama.

    Sharky

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    24

    Default

    From the Wiki :
    This does not affect cards using proprietary drivers or not using DRI2 because it is specific to the glx module that the open drivers use.
    So it doesn't affect all.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    130

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bulletxt View Post
    Yea, but I'm curious to see how stable it is now that it comes out, especially on the server side.
    Then why do you care about a GLX issue?

  9. #29

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bulletxt View Post
    I have a feeling that Ubuntu 10.04 is like a toy made of pieces of Lego.
    Do not blaspheme, LEGO blocks were very solid

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    99

    Default Redemption Is At Hand

    From the ubuntu-dev mailing list -

    "Thanks to the tireless investigations of Robert Hooker and Tormod Volden ..."

    Well done guys. You may well have averted a disaster.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •