Page 6 of 18 FirstFirst ... 4567816 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 180

Thread: More Radeon Power Management Improvements

  1. #51
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    332

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by netkas View Post
    I run glxgears then change profile from high to low, and doesnt see any noticable fps change
    http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Glx...ot_a_Benchmark

  2. #52
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    122

    Default

    u really think I dont know it?

    lower core clock -> lower freq of triangle setup stage -> a bit slower rendering -> should result in little fps drop, but there was no drop.

  3. #53
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    87

    Default

    Maybe pm isn't working at all for you, just like it isn't working for me

  4. #54
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LiquidAcid View Post
    Huh, what makes you think so?

    Neither the DDX nor mesa do interface with the pm AFAIK, so why would it be necessary to rebuild X components?
    Error message in X that drm failed (while dmesg says that drm is initialized). Now there is no message about drm failure.

    OK. Maybe I'm just another blind man near elephant ;-)

  5. #55
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    332

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by netkas View Post
    u really think I dont know it?

    lower core clock -> lower freq of triangle setup stage -> a bit slower rendering -> should result in little fps drop, but there was no drop.
    maybe your fps was cpu limited to begin with, so your fps didnt really change.
    who knows

  6. #56
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    122

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pfanne View Post
    maybe your fps was cpu limited to begin with, so your fps didnt really change.
    who knows
    I was right!

    here is results with latest radeon-testing branch

    14937 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2986.450 FPS
    16194 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3238.794 FPS
    16354 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3270.604 FPS
    14908 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2981.395 FPS
    switch from default to low
    12667 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2533.344 FPS
    12694 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2535.207 FPS
    12616 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2522.880 FPS
    12609 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2521.765 FPS
    12641 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2528.155 FPS
    switch from low to high
    13927 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2785.204 FPS
    14070 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2813.940 FPS


    still memory reclocking results in screen flickerings.

    and dynpm method seems to doesnt work at all, it just keeps using profile I set before.

  7. #57
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,402

    Default

    gears is definitely cpu bound; it's basically a test of how fast your CPU can send command buffers to the GPU. If you force your CPU into it's highest power state you'll see a nice jump in performance.

  8. #58
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    122

    Default

    sure, but I was measuring with same(highest) cpu speed all the way.

  9. #59
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    39

    Default Experimenting with new PM

    Hi all! I was (and still am) happy with my Debian Lenny & fglrx on my HP Compaq NC8430 notebook with X1600 Mobility, but reading about the advances I decided to give the open power management a try. First I tried Ubuntu Lucid, with overclock.net's howto's I installed a new kernel and I was really impressed, now my fan spins almost regularly at 55% which is where fglrx (and Windows) make it too, without the recent power management advances it would be at 70% or sometimes even at 80%.

    Power consumption was not as satisfactory, though. I managed to get Lucid at 27.4 W, whereas Lenny with fglrx is at 20.5 W, still far from Windows at 13-14 W. Powertop was constantly reporting something about sound modules that I tried to google but didn't find any other solution than blacklisting them, but it still didn't lower the power consumption.

    Then I thought about why not trying Arch Linux, where no bloat is installed. I used to have Arch on my previous laptop, but due to overheating the X1600 I had stopped using it on NC8430. I downloaded the newest install image, and to my surprise the 2.6.33 kernel's KMS didn't work on my computer (the screen got all striped, like a loading screen of Sinclair Spectrum's tape programs making it unreadable, although I could see that the screen was functioning "behind the stripes"). So I had to disable KMS already at the install phase (and get the fan to 80%!). I updated to the new kernel on my hot computer, only to see that it didn't have power profiles (maybe it would have had dynamic PM but I didn't try it). So then another kernel from radeon repo and voilą, I had PM even without Xorg! However, power consumption is only marginally better than Lucid's at 25.9 W so there's still some work ahead, although I'm not sure whether it is with the GPU or other components, and I haven't undervolted the CPU yet which I always do with windows, there's a kernel version conflict with PHC that I try to resolve next.

    If it is of any use for the developers, I post here some readings of the temperature sensors as a benchmark. I don't remember (or even know) what they are exactly besides the last one that is the fan percentage. The numbering has two ways, TZ0-TZ5 or T1-T6, but the order below is from smallest to largest (the last being the fan):

    Code:
    Temp sensor  : T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6
    Windows Vista: 50 44 43 39 20 55, power consumption 14 W
    Ubuntu Lucid : 50 44 58 40 31 55, power consumption 27.4 W
    Arch Linux   : 50 45 56 40 29 55, power consumption 25.9 W
    (When I tested Lenny the computer hadn't "warmed up" for these numbers to be comparable, but the power consumption was 20.5 W)

    Time permitting, I am willing to run new tests to see how close to Windows Linux's PM can get.

    So a big thank you and congratulations to the developers, you are doing really well!

  10. #60
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    3

    Default

    Hi, sorry for stupidly jumping in but I am kind of lost in the debris of this thread.

    So, simple question: can I get the PM patch somewhere in a consistent state applicable to 2.6.35rc4 kernel, or maybe to 2.6.34?

    I measured my (idle) system's power consumption. Using fglrx instead of KMS makes a difference of about 45W which is a lot in these hot days.

    Gfx card: regular HD5770.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •